Rev. G. H. Kersten
Election
is the decree of God by which He in perfect sovereignty determined
in which persons, known to Him by name in Christ, He has decided
to magnify His mercy gloriously unto their salvation, and also by
which means He Himself shall bring those persons to salvation.
This decree is the Book of life, in which the
names of the elect are written. (Rev. 20)
Scripture uses the word elect or chosen
in different ways. Sometimes it is used in connection with a certain
office, either a civil or an ecclesiastical office.
In I Sam. 10:24, I Sam. 16:10, and in Ps. 78:70 it is used in the
first sense; and in Luke 6:13 and John 6:70 in the second sense.
In other places the elect are the entire Jewish
people, unto whom God had given His laws and statutes. (Deut.
4:37; 7:7)
Often choosing means setting apart in time
according to the eternal decree and by effectual calling. (Ps. 4:3;
John 15:16; 15:19; I Cor. 1:27,28)
Finally, and most commonly the word election
is used to signify God’s eternal decree to the salvation of God’s
people. (Rom.8:29,30,33; Eph. 1:4; Rev. 1:4)
The sovereign, eternal, and unchangeable election
took place in Christ. (Eph. 1:4) In the election of Christ
as Mediator lies the election of those who shall be saved. His election
and theirs are one. Therefore, already in election the union of
Christ with the elect is established. He is the head, and they are
His body. Hence, Paul states that the election in Christ is the
fountain of all blessings in Christ. In the first chapter of the
epistle to the Ephesians Paul glories in the blessings with which
the elect are blessed in Christ. More than ten times Paul says that
the elect are blessed in Christ. In Him they are blessed
with all spiritual blessings. (ver. 3) By Him they have the adoption
of children. (ver. 5) In Him they receive grace. (ver. 6) In Him
they have redemption. (ver. 7) In Him they have obtained an inheritance.
(ver. 11) In Him they are gathered together. (ver. 10) In Him they
were called and blessed and sealed, etc., (ver. 13) and that all
because they were predestinated in Him. (ver. 5)
Although the elect were chosen in Christ, Christ
is not the cause of election, any more than faith or good works
can be. The sovereignty of God does not suffer any other cause beside
itself. Christ Himself is the object of election: He is the Savior
by election; election is not because of Him. Election is
ascribed to the Triune God. To the Father: “Elect according
to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of
the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus
Christ: Grace unto you, and peace be multiplied.” (I Peter 1:2)
“According as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of
the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in
love.” (Eph. 1:4) “Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in Thy
sight.” (Matt. 11:26) “All that the Father giveth Me shall come
to Me; and him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out.” (John
6:37)
Election is also the work of the Son: “I know
whom I have chosen.” (John 3:18) “Ye have not chose Me, but I have
chosen you.” (John 15:16)
Election is also ascribed to the Holy Spirit,
as we can conclude from I Cor. 6:11, “And such were some of you:
but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in
the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” (ICor.
6:11)
Although election, therefore, is ascribed to
each of the three Divine Persons, nevertheless, it is particularly
the work of the Father.
The description of election given above shows
that God:
- chose the persons,
- determined the means by which
He would accomplish His election,
- established the purpose of election,
namely, the glorification of His mercy in the salvation of His
people.
Now we will briefly discuss each of these points.
a.) That there is an election in which God destines salvation
for certain persons chosen by Him in His eternal sovereignty,
God’s Word teaches us in many places, such as these: “For whom He
did foreknow them He also called: and whom He called them He also
justified: and whom He justified them He also glorified. What shall
we say then to these things? If God be for us, who can be against
us?” (Rom. 8:29,30,31) “For the children being not yet born, neither
having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according
to election might stand, not of works, but of Him that calleth.
. . . For He saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have
mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth,
but of God that showeth mercy.” (Rom. 9:11,15,16) “For God hath
not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus
Christ.” (I Thess. 5:9) “Elect according to the foreknowledge of
God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience
and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and
peace be multiplied.” (I Peter 1:2) “So the last shall be first,
and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.” (Matt.
20:16)
This predetermination from eternity makes the
salvation of the elect unshakably certain, because all that God
has decreed from eternity shall certainly take place in time. “In
whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according
to the purpose of Him who worketh all things after the counsel of
His own will.” (Eph. 1:11) “Known unto God are all His works from
the beginning of the world.” (Acts 15:18)
Thus also eternal salvation is destined by God
and is unshakably certain for those who are appointed to it. Everyone
who has received an impression of the blessedness of God must realize
how they who make man’s eternal destiny depend upon man’s free will,
and keep it outside of God’s counsel, as the Pelagians do, violate
the honor of God.
b.) The means determined by God
which He himself grants in accomplishing the election are the union
and communion with Christ by faith, justification, sanctification,
and the adoption of children. In a very unique sense Christ can
be called the means, for the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper
in His hand. (Isa. 53:10) Moreover all that which serves to make
them conformed to the image of His Son (Rom. 8:29) through the sanctification
of the Spirit (I Peter 1:2) can be counted as means by which God
gathers His elect.
c.) The most perfect purpose of
election is the glory of God. Election is indeed to the salvation
of God’s people, but that salvation is to the glory of God. “And
that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels
of mercy, which He had afore prepared unto glory.” (Rom. 9:23)
Characteristics
Here we must make a few remarks on a few characteristics
of election. Election is from eternity. “According as He
hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world.” (Eph.
1:4) The election from eternity is certainly performed in time (I
Cor. 1:26-28) before we believe and before we die. God draws His
own in this life. He plucks them as a brand out of the fire. (Zech.
3:2) He passes them by in the open field (Ezek. 16) knowing perfectly
those who are His.
Scripture speaks about the immutability
of election in II Tim. 2:19; Rom. 8:29; 9:11; and other places.
The number of the elect is determined, and can be neither increased
nor decreased. This the Word of God testifies for the comfort of
His people. No one shall pluck them out of the Father’s hand. Election
is the unfathomable and inexpressible source of comfort for God’s
poor people who are entirely lost in themselves. According to His
pleasure God is glorified in them to their salvation. They are saved,
not because they want to be saved, but because God wants to save
them. “By Thee, by Thee alone, because of Thy eternal good pleasure.”
Our attention should especially be drawn to the
fact that there is but one election to salvation. All those
who teach the free will of fallen man, if they still deal with election,
speak of many kinds of elections, as do the Pelagians, Socinians
, Semi-Pelagians, among whom are the Roman Catholics, and alas,
also many Lutherans.
Rejecting their blasphemous errors, the Reformed
out of all countries, who were gathered at Dort confessed: “There
are not various decrees of election, but one and the same decree
respecting all those, who shall be saved, both under the Old and
New Testament: since Scripture declares the good pleasure and counsel
of the divine will to be one, according to which He hath chosen
us from eternity, both to grace and glory, to salvation and the
way of salvation, which He hath ordained what we should walk therein.”
(Canons of Dort, I, Art. 8)
Those who hold the free will of fallen man deny
the election of persons by the sovereign will of God. They assert
that there is only an election of state and condition. According
to them, God chose those who will believe, and rejected those who
do not want to believe. Those that still speak of an election of
persons say it is general and conditional. Thus, for
example, the election of Peter would have taken place with the condition
of faith and repentance, worked by himself in his own power. Furthermore
these erring spirits speak of an election that is temporary
and changeable, so that, for example, God decided to save
Peter when he believed, but only if he persevered. This comfortless
doctrine of the Pelagians leaves those that believe in despair until
they die, for according to them it is possible any moment to lose
their faith and fall out of election. “The foundation of God standeth
sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are His.” (II
Tim. 2:19)
All of Scripture testifies against these abominable
errors just mentioned. Moreover some even sank so far as to speak
of a general election of all rational creatures. Origen taught
that not only all people shall be saved, but also the devils who
have been chosen thereto shall be saved after they have spent a
certain length of time in hell to suffer their punishment. In the
16th century Puccius and Huberus followed him. God’s Word, however,
very clearly denies a general election. “For many are called, but
few are chosen.” (Matt. 20:16, and 22:14) “If ye were of the world,
the world would love its own: but because ye are not of the world,
but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth
you.” (John 15:19) “I have manifested Thy name unto the men which
Thou gayest Me out of the world: Thine they were, and Thou gayest
them Me; and they have kept My word.” (John 17:6) “For whom He did
foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image
of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren”.
(Rom. 8:29) “As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have
I hated.” “For He saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will
have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.”
“Therefore hath He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He
will He hardeneth.” (Rom. 8:13,15,18) “For God hath not appointed
us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ.”
(I Thess. 5:9)
The word election excludes universality. For
to elect means to choose out of a multitude, and this conflicts
with an election of all. (John 15:19) Also, if there were a general
election, there would be no reprobation, which, however, Scripture
teaches. (Rom. 9:13; Jude 4; Prov. 16:4; Matt. 25:41) There is not
one place in God’s Word that teaches a general election, which would
be fruitless, and left undone, unless one accepts the idea that
all men shall be saved, which is contrary to the entire Scripture,
so that it deserves not one word of contradiction.
In Rom. 9:18 election, which there is called
mercy, is not said to be general, as our opponents assert. The whole
9th chapter of the epistle to the Romans testifies against them.
Is there any other chapter that teaches so clearly that both election
and rejection of persons known to God by name are acts of perfect
sovereignty? No, election is not general.
Neither does John 3:16 give erring spirits any
ground. The “world” in this text means the world of the elect, not
only of the Jews, but also of the heathen.
Other texts that are used to confirm their theory
include: “Who will have all men to be saved.” (I Tim. 2:4) “Say
unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in
the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and
live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die,
O house of Israel?” (Ezek. 33:11) “The Lord is not slack concerning
His promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to
usward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should
come to repentance.” (II Peter 3:9)
In I Tim. 2:4 Paul speaks of all men,
both those in authority, and the subjects; and Ezekiel speaks of
the death of those sinners which are converted by grace, namely
God’s elect; while Peter teaches that God does not want any of the
believers who have the promise to be lost. None of these texts,
therefore speak of an election of all people. Nor is there a falling
away of the saints. The Arminians speak of such a falling away,
and point to I Tim. 1:19,20, where however, Paul does not speak
of the falling away of true believers, but of outward confessors
and temporary believers. These are like the seed that falls in stony
places. They receive the word immediately with joy, but they are
never rooted in Christ, and therefore wither. (Matt. 13:20,21)
Scripture speaks of a falling away, but only
of those who are not chosen unto salvation, and this happens so
that we will examine ourselves, and seek our salvation only in Christ,
and also so that God’s true people would not be troubled too much,
when some fall away from the faith, and turn again to the love of
the world.
The elect, however, shall inherit salvation to
which they and only they, are chosen.
We must defend the unconditionalness of
election against the Pelagians, Socinians, and the Roman Catholics.
The Pelagians and Socinians teach an election
based on foreseen faith and good works; and the Romanists on foreseen
merits. These statements are inseparably connected with their doctrine
of the free will of man. God’s Word, however speaks of the good
pleasure of God as absolutely the only cause of election, as we
have already seen. The Pelagians and the Semi-Pelagians appeal to
Romans 8:29, and to I Pet. 1:1,2, where foreordination is emphatically
called foreknowledge, but the foreknowledge of God did not
take place because of foreseen faith, and that is the main point
the Pelagians want to teach. God loves only those who are in Christ
in whom they are elected (Eph. 1:4) before the foundation of the
world (I Pet. 1:20). “Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy
calling, not according to works, but according to His own purpose
and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.”
(II Tim. 1:9)
We must also reject on the grounds of Scripture,
as did Augustine and the Reformers, the doctrine of the Romanists
defended by Catharinus at the Council of Trent, that the election
to grace is absolute and independent, but the election to
glory is conditional. There is only one election, and this one
election is called an election of grace, because it excludes all
merit of good works, and this election of grace is to the glory
of God. “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of
yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should
boast.” (Eph. 2:8,9) “And base things of the world, and things which
are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to
bring to nought things that are: That no flesh should glory in His
presence.” (I Cor. 1:28,29) “Who shall lay any thing to the charge
of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth.” (Rom. 8:33) “For the
gifts and calling of God are without repentance.” (Rom. 11:29) “Nevertheless
the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord
knoweth them that are His.” (II Tim. 2:19)
Let this be enough for Rome. The election is
of the good pleasure of God, and is unchangeable. This is
the comfortable doctrine of God’s Testimony. The elect shall
be saved. In this life they can receive the assurance of it
to strengthen them as we see in Luke 10:20, “Notwithstanding in
this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather
rejoice, because your names are written in heaven.”
The Pelagians have indeed objected that no one
has ascended into heaven to look into the book of life, but the
Lord does reveal His pleasure to His people. Therefore Peter admonished
the elect to make their calling and election sure. They are sure
in God, and the believers make it sure in their hearts. The assurance
of faith is inseparably connected with the assurance of election.
Those purchased by the blood of Christ, according to the good pleasure
of the Father, are gathered at God’s time into the church of those
that shall be saved. They receive a new life, and this has its marks
by which everyone can examine himself, and from which their election
to salvation is evident to the comfort of God’s people. “For God
so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever
believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
(John 3:16) “For which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless
I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded
that He is able to keep that which I have committed unto Him against
that day.” (II Tim. 1:12)
This assurance of salvation does not make men
careless and profane as the Pelagians charge, but rather inspires
men to a holy walk. “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling”.
(Phil. 2:12) It also awakens in them a longing for perfection, as
we see in Paul’s seeking to attain perfection, for which Christ
had apprehended him. (Phil. 3:12) And the elect are apprehended
to the eternal glory of God in perfect felicity.
Reprobation
Reprobation is the decree, whereby God from eternity,
in His sovereign good pleasure, foreordained in which rational creatures
He shall glorify Himself by His avenging justice to their eternal
punishment in hell.
The Lord did not only elect to eternal life,
but also to eternal perdition. Reprobation is the opposite of election.
“Therefore He hath mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He
will He hardeneth.” (Rom. 9:18)
Reprobation is also expressed negatively. Of
the reprobate it is said, “Whose names are not written in the book
of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” (Rev.
13:8; 17:8)
Reprobation is not only in God’s foreknowledge,
but it is God’s decree, in which He, for the glorification
of His righteousness has determined the dreadful destination of
those who shall receive the reward of unrighteousness. As election
is a sovereign act, so is reprobation. In Scripture this
is called God’s hating. “Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith
the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau.” (Mal. 1:2,3) “As
it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated”. (Rom.
9:13)
It is also called an appointing to wrath.
“For God hath not appointed us to wrath”. (I Thess. 5:9)
It is also called being appointed to disobedience.
“Even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto
also they were appointed.” (I Peter 2:8)
It is also called being fitted to destruction.
“What if God, willing to show His wrath, and to make His power known,
endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction.”
(Rom. 9:22)
It is also called being before ordained to
condemnation. “For there are certain men crept in unawares,
who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men.
.. .“ (Jude 4)
From the scriptures quoted it is very evident
that reprobation is more than letting one lie in the state wherein
he fell. It is a predetermination of the state of perdition,
both of angels and of men, for God also determined to decree some
of the angels to perdition, reserving them in everlasting chains
under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. (Jude 6) The
reprobate are appointed, ordained, and fitted to destruction.
In Article XVI of the Belgic Confession reprobation
is spoken of in this way that God has shown Himself to be as He
is, “that is to say merciful and just. ... Just, in leaving others
in the fall and perdition wherein they have involved themselves”.
These words, however, deal with the performance
of God’s decree which occurs in time when man has cast himself into
perdition. Thus God has shown Himself as He is. God shows
this, however, by virtue of His “eternal and unchangeable counsel.”
(See Art XVI) Also in the Canons of Dort reprobation is spoken of
as the lot of the non-elect, (I, 6) whom God leaves in common misery.
(I, 15) But then it is also emphatically stated that this happens
to those whom God in His “sovereign, most just, irreprehensible
and unchangeable good pleasure” left in their misery. Reprobation
is therefore no more a passive decree, than election is; it is an
active decree.
The Cause
The Cause of reprobation does not lie in anything
outside of God, not even in sin, but in God’s absolute sovereignty.
“(For the children being not yet born, neither having done good
or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand,
not of works, but of Him that calleth;) It was said unto her, The
elder shall serve the younger. Therefore hath He mercy on whom He
will have mercy, and whom He will He hardeneth. Nay but, 0 man,
who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say
to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the
potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel
unto honor, and another unto dishonor?” (Rom. 9:11,12,18,20,21)
Righteous punishment certainly follows
sin, but the reason why God determined to be glorified in exercising
His righteousness does not lie in sin, but in God’s sovereignty.
Sin is the meriting cause of punishment. The determining
cause of the state of reprobation is the sovereignty of God.
Thus reprobation is the independent decree of God from eternity,
the sovereign, the decreeing God Himself. It is an act of the Father’s
good pleasure. “Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in Thy sight”.
(Matt. 11:26)
Sin, unbelief, hardness, and whatever else is
mentioned as a reason for the righteous judgment of God, all follows
the decree of God, and is not the cause of the decree. God
is sovereign in election, but also in rejection. Both depend on
nothing but God’s sovereign pleasure, and, being God’s decree they
cannot be dependent upon some one or some thing outside of God.
“The LORD hath made all things for Himself: yea, even the wicked
for the day of evil.” (Prov. 16:4)
If sin were the cause of reprobation, then God
would be dependent upon man’s actions in His decrees. Moreover,
then all men would be reprobated, because all have sinned.
Not general. As election is not general,
neither is reprobation. There are no general decrees. God’s decrees
are limited, also the decree of predestination. It concerns certain
people, known to God by name. Neither then is reprobation a general
decree, in which God only would have determined to condemn the unbelievers
and the wicked, without having predestinated the individual persons.
That is the doctrine of the Pelagians and Arminians.
But such a general decree would not be a decree. Exercising God’s
righteousness to the condemnation of the wicked needs no separate
decree for it flows from His holy Essence, which is perfectly righteous.
Thus the Scriptures say very emphatically that God did not decree
to elect and reject in general, but that He hated Esau and loved
Jacob. (Rom. 9:11,18,20-22)
Pharaoh is also a proof of this: “For the Scripture
saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee
up, that I might show My power in thee, and that My Name might
be declared throughout all the earth.” (Rom. 9:17)
Judas went to his own place. (Acts 1:25) This
place was determined by God. The reprobate, being persons known
by God, are not written in the book of life (Rev. 13:8), are not
Christ’s sheep (John 10:26), are appointed to disobedience (I Pet.
2:8), and were before ordained to condemnation. (Jude 4)
Reprobation took place to the glorification of
God, especially of His sovereignty and righteousness. God has no
desire in the death of sinners in itself. The Lord confirms it with
an oath to those who by grace turn to Him. But God does have a desire
for the glorification of His perfections. He is the Potter, Who
according to His eternal good pleasure, makes from the same lump
of clay one vessel to honor, and another unto dishonor. To that
end God not only decided to create, but also to form the wicked
unto the day of evil; allowing sin, and righteously condemning him
who commits the sin. (Rom. 9:18) “For this cause God shall send
them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: that they
all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure
in unrighteousness.” (II Thess. 2:11,12)
Condemnation is to be distinguished from reprobation.
Condemnation is an act of God’s righteousness, and reprobation is
an act of His Sovereignty. Reprobation precedes sin, and does not
happen because of it, but condemnation follows sin, and is its righteous
reward.
The means. The decree of reprobation also
determined the means by which it would be fulfilled. These means,
however, are not the cause of reprobation, for they do not precede
the decree, but follow upon it. These means include allowing the
fall along with the resulting blindness: “And He said, Go,
and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see
ye indeed, but perceive not,” (Isa. 6:9); hardness: “Therefore they
could not believe, because Esaias said again, He hath blinded their
eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their
eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should
heal them, (John 12:39,40); and disobedience: “Disobedient, whereunto
they were also appointed.” (I Peter 2:8)
How clearly Scripture shows in all these places
that blindness, hardness, and disobedience came according to the
determinate counsel of God. Unless God glorifies His grace in man’s
heart, he hardens himself in sin. Although the guilt of that hardening
lies with man, nevertheless, the Divine reprobation is executed
by it. Scripture then also speaks in the texts quoted above in both
a positive manner of blinding and hardening, and in a negative manner,
as of not enlightening, not showing mercy, and not giving grace.
The reprobate are not savingly called (Matt. 20:16); their
sins are not forgiven (John 20:23); faith is not given them
(Acts 13:46). This is not to be understood in such a sense as if
God would work the blinding and hardening Himself, nor as if He
would merely allow sin and then wait to see what man would omit
or commit, but according to His sovereign will He gives the reprobate
over to his own blindness and hardness, and to the deception of
Satan. (Romans 9:7-18; I Pet. 2:8) Thus man works out his own judgment
to which he was appointed. The hardening in unbelief and the impenitence
and withholding of saving grace belong to the means God has determined
to use in performing His reprobation. (Jude 4) “I thank Thee, O
Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because Thou hast hid these things
from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Even
so, Father, for so it seemed good in Thy sight.” (Matt. 11:26,27)
In these words Christ thanks His Father for election
and rejection. “Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they
seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand”.
(Matt. 13:13) It is remarkable that the Lord does not say “so
that” but “because” seeing they see not. Therefore He
spoke in parables which He explained only to His disciples. John
8:47 and 10:26 mean the same thing: “He that is of God heareth God’s
words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.” “But
ye believe not, because ye are not of My sheep as I said unto you.”
The means mentioned both in a positive and negative
manner lie under the direct determination and ruling of God’s will
and serve to perform His reprobation. It is certain that the reprobate
are disobedient and shall not see life (John 3:36), because reprobation
is unchangeable. The number of reprobates is determined by
God as well as their persons. (Rom. 9:11,12) Indeed Scripture teaches
us that reprobation comprehends the most people. “Enter ye in at
the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that
leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because
strait is the gate and narrow is the way which leadeth unto life,
and few there be that find it.” (Matt. 7:13,14) “For many be called,
but few chosen.” (Matt. 20:16)
All those who deny man’s state of death, oppose
this doctrine of reprobation as taught by the Scripture. We meet
the same opposition here that we encountered against the doctrine
of election. If they still speak of reprobation, they mean only
the determination of the state of man, but will have nothing
to do with the reprobation of persons, unless a man having died,
it was proved that he did not want to believe. Or, as the Arminians,
Romanists, Lutherans, and many Anabaptists teach, a conditional
reprobation of persons. This would follow only after proved perseverance
in hardness. God’s decree would thus be conditional, and dependent
upon the acts of man. A more absurd statement is unthinkable.
Some object that the absolutely personal reprobation
would compel men to sin. This accusation is very absurd,
for reprobation is an immanent work in God, and hence does not necessitate
man to commit sin. On the contrary, man sins willingly and voluntarily,
following his evil desires against his duty and better knowledge,
and he hardens himself in spite of many callings to repentance.
On that ground the second accusation also falls
away, that it makes God to be an author of sin. We have already
opposed that attack. God does not work sin; He grants rational creatures
all the necessary gifts to resist sin. Angels and men fell according
to the determined counsel of God, but not because God worked sin.
The creature did so himself, and that without compulsion, entirely
voluntarily.
Others, opposing reprobation, think it is unjust.
God has concluded all under sin. Thus man, they say, must sin, and
therefore the sentence to perdition is unjust.
To this we respond: (1) reprobation does not
compel men to sin; but righteous judgment follows his voluntary
action: and (2) reprobation is a decree of God, immanent in the
Essence of God, and is an act of sovereignty, not of justice.
The exercise of justice follows the sin, and therefore the condemnation
is just. The righteous sentence over sin condemns it, but reprobation
does not. Yet the decree of God determined this sentence, therefore
the reprobates are called vessels of wrath fitted for destruction.
(Rom. 9:22)
Finally, the opposers of reprobation reject the
sovereignty of God. According to these erring spirits it is improper
that God should destine man to perdition to glorify His attributes,
without viewing him as created and fallen, laying the cause in the
decree, the good pleasure of God. The apostle shuts the mouths of
those who rebel against God by saying, “Nay but, O man, who art
thou that repliest against God?” (Rom. 9:20,21)
Neither does the decree of reprobation conflict
with the earnest and sincere invitation of salvation to sinners,
as it takes place in preaching the Gospel. It is an abominable slander
to accuse God of hypocrisy. The invitation of God in the Gospel
is true, even though God decrees to withdraw the grace of repentance
from the reprobate, to the giving of which He was not obliged. Thus
the ministration of the Gospel must serve to the greater glory of
the righteousness of God in those that harden themselves, and God
is also thereby glorified in those that shall be lost, as well as
in those that shall be saved. (II Cor. 2:15,16)
Since reprobation flows from the sovereignty
of God, man is considered as not yet created, and not
yet fallen. We must remember this, especially against the Arminians,
concerning little children. The Arminians exclude children entirely
from reprobation when they hold only a reprobation for those who
misuse their so-called free will. The Semi-Pelagians who only speak
of the foreknowledge and not of the decree of God in reference to
foreordination, imagine a kind of inbetween stage for the children
in which only a punishment of deprivation is given them. God’s Word,
however, teaches us a reprobation out of God’s absolute sovereignty,
and not because of the misuse of a free will which we do not have.
Moreover, the apostle says emphatically that
election and rejection take place before the children have done
anything good or evil (Rom. 9:11) since also the children are included
in the fall of Adam (Ps. 51:5) and are therefore subject to the
judgment of death. (Rom. 5:14)
The doctrine of reprobation gives no one an excuse
to sin, any more than that of election does. One day God shall judge
every man according to his sins, and the mouth of the mocker will
be stopped for ever.
On the other hand, let not the doctrine of reprobation
discourage us, but lead us to adore the absolute sovereignty of
God. For man it is hidden which persons God has decreed to reprobation,
but, although there is no hope for those who die in their impenitence,
nevertheless, it has pleased God to give examples in His Word of
stubborn and great sinners who came to repentance, such as Manasseh
and Paul; yea, of those who at the end of their life were plucked
as a brand out of the fire, as the thief on the cross. (Luke 23:42,43)
At the eleventh hour workers were still hired in the vineyard, which
received the full wages of grace. (Matt. 20:9) So Scripture proclaims
to us the riches of the grace of God in Christ, which is “abundantly
sufficient to expiate the sins of the whole world,” (Canons of Dort,
II, 3) “although the quickening and saving efficacy of the most
precious death of His Son should extend to all the elect, for this
was the sovereign counsel and most gracious will and purpose of
God the Father” (Canons of Dort 11,8). “Though your sins be as scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow though they be red like crimson,
they shall be as wool.” (Isa. 1:18) “This is a faithful saying,
and worthy of all acceptation, that Jesus Christ came into the world
to save sinners; of whom I am chief.” (I Timothy 1:15)
May the proclamation of the greatness of the
grace of God preserve each of us from despairing of the possibility
of being saved, since we, as far as our state and condition are
concerned, though we may be the chief of sinners, are still living
in the acceptable time, in the day of salvation.
The chapter we have just finished is of such
great importance that we must continually remind each other of it
that we may not give up even the smallest part of the truth. Daniel
Tilenus is certainly a terrible example of those who err in this
matter. He was the famous theologian for whose safety in the dispute
between him and the Parisian minister Dumoulin, not only the English
King James I, but also the professors and ministers tried their
best and wrote a letter to the great French church assembly, on
April 5, 1614. This Tilenus came to such an extreme mockery of the
Reformed doctrine that in his “refutation of the Canons of Dort”
he dared to write that if in hell a council of evil spirits came
together to ask advice of their fellow angels as to what fabrication
could best inspire and draw out the most hatred of man against God,
no one could imagine or invent anything better suited to this purpose
than the decree of predestination.
Tilenus is indeed a proof of the fact that those
who set their feet on the way to Pelagianism, and to whom the devil
has given his poison, will never be reclaimed or brought back unless
God does wonders, as Comrie rightly remarks when relating these
matters.
How necessary it is then for everyone to preserve
the pure doctrine of God’s Word so richly developed by the Reformers,
and particularly that of predestination. It elevates God’s sovereignty
to the highest and is a source of comfort for all who fear the Lord
causing them to boast by faith in the unshakable foundation of salvation,
which lies firm in God from eternity. The devil and unbelief may
fight against grace received in the soul, but no enemy can ever
touch the foundations of salvation which God has prepared for those
who fear Him. The firm foundation of God stands sure, having this
seal: “The Lord knoweth them that are His.” (II Tim. 2:19)
This article is taken from Reformed
Dogmatics: A Systematic Treatment of Reformed Doctrine by Rev.
G. H. Kersten, Volume I, pp. 130-135. It was presented for publication
by the Netherlands Reformed book and Publishing Committee and printed
by (Wm. B. Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, MI, 1980)
Return to the Main Highway
Return to the Predestination Index
:-) <——
|