Donations for the month of January


We have received a total of $155 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Featured Member
Registered: Monday, May 23, 2016
Posts: 105
Forum Stats
891 Members
30 Forums
6292 Topics
49083 Posts

Max Online: 72 @ Thursday, September 8, 2016 10:03 PM
Top Posters
Pilgrim 13821
J_Edwards 4843
Tom 4266
Wes 3553
chestnutmare 2765
CovenantInBlood 2375
MarieP 2311
RJ_ 2289
John_C 2044
gotribe 1780
Top Posters (30 Days)
Tom 18
Pilgrim 15
chestnutmare 7
rstrats 7
AJ Castellitto 6
Mckinley 6
John_C 3
usher 1
Robin 1
RJ_ 1
Recent Posts
JI Packer Question
by chestnutmare
Sunday, January 15, 2017 6:53 AM
Genesis 1 & 2. What do we have a right to deduce?
by Pilgrim
Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:18 PM
Enough with the 4 pointers
by Pilgrim
Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:09 AM
Reading and Meditation
by chestnutmare
Monday, January 9, 2017 10:17 AM
orthodoxy Christianity
by Tom
Saturday, January 7, 2017 4:36 PM
Is Love a Feeling?
by Tom
Saturday, January 7, 2017 11:27 AM
Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:04 PM Genesis 1 & 2. What do we have a right to deduce? by usher


I've recently had the privilege of a private email exchange with Joseph Nally, one of your own at IIIMill. He directed me here, as he hadn't time to continue the exchange.

One thing he said was (my emphasis):

Quote:
Though it is not recorded that God said anything like, "Adam, I command you to name these animal" this does not mean He didnít! Genesis 1-2 is not a complete record. It is historical and it is accurate, but it is not complete (does not recount every conversation between God and Adam, or every aspect of creation). In addition, Adam could have been just following the example of God himself in naming each of the days. Or he could have been told to name items, as in those days naming something meant your power over that which was named, which Adam was given by God (Gen 1:26). We simply do not know.


I'm wondering what 3Mill teaches about God and Adam actually conversing. Nally here seems to be saying that they did, indeed, converse. But the accounts (Gen 1 and 2) do not say they conversed. On what grounds should we assume they did?

Thanks.

47 Views · 1 Comments
Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:11 PM JI Packer Question by Tom

My pastor was telling me how years ago he took a course under JI Packer and for the most part he really liked the course. However, my pastor said that one conversation he had with Dr. Packer left him scratching his head.
Packer asked him if he was Reformed and when he said yes. He asked him another question. "Are you confessional?" My pastor also said yes to this.
Dr. Packer then said: (with a little bit of a frown on his face) "I could never be confessional."
Like my pastor, I am not sure why he would say something like that.
Anyone have any ideas as to why?

Tom

81 Views · 3 Comments
Monday, January 9, 2017 6:07 PM Enough with the 4 pointers by Mckinley

Why is it that many want to claim to be Reformed and even acknowledge that they proudly hold to being a 4 point Calvinist,.. my question stems with this declaration, what is Amyraldism, and how wrong is this theology?

115 Views · 3 Comments
Friday, January 6, 2017 1:20 PM Is Love a Feeling? by Tom

I was recently involved in a Reformed blog where the question was asked "Is Love a Feeling?
I said to the person that love is not a feeling, because if love was a feeling, one could fall in and out of love, based on how they feel in the moment. I went on to state that love certainly creates feelings, but it is not a feeling in itself.
Other replies , were in agreement with this, except for one person who said he was surprised that so many who are Reformed would give an answer like that. For Reformed people have always affirmed that love was indeed a feeling. He said anyone who has read history would know this. For example Jonathon Edwards, was very clear about "religious affections", that love was a feeling that was pure, unlike the feelings that change like the emotions of sinful man.
What are your thoughts on the matter?

Tom

112 Views · 2 Comments
Friday, January 6, 2017 7:14 AM Happy 21st Anniversary by chestnutmare

Happy 21st Anniversary to The Highway!

The Lord has seen fit to keep The Highway website and discussion board online for yet another year. May it be His pleasure to continue His providential care of it and all those who appreciate its online presence.


72 Views · 1 Comments
Who's Online
1 registered (chestnutmare), 39 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
usher, Tracker, wins3, dennis G, Lynette
891 Registered Users
Shout Box

January
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Today's Birthdays
Ken_Smith, Mckinley
(Views)Popular Topics
Is man required to "choose" in order to be saved? 1025044
Westminster Larger Catechism 761062
...The people miscalled Antinomians ? 692133
Roman Catholicism and salvation 579810
Double predestination 547761
The importance of going to church 481469
Gospel truth 474843
"Christ died in a general way for all."? 427961
Creation 372656
Continuity in Old and NT 369481