Quote
speratus said:
However, if the difference was really significant, why don't the Reform split over this issue? From your previous statements, you appear to be Zwinglian. Yet, you confess the Calvinist WCF?
I do not embrace the Zwinglian view. I've never said that I did nor even hinted that I even sympathized with that view. On the matter of the Lord's Supper, I find no differences between what I hold and what the WCF states. You really need to get out of the house more. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Quote
Lastly you said:
As Belgic Confession states, the false church persecutes those who live holy lives and who rebuke it for its faults, greed, and idolatry (e.g., Dr. Shultz).
But I hope you aren't going to tell me that you: 1) are applying a statement from one of those "false churches" you denigrate to your "only true church on earth"? Wouldn't that be hypocritical? 2) honestly believe that every statement ever made by anyone or any group, denomination, etc., which contradicts what you and/or your denomination believe is persecuting the "one true church on earth"?

QUESTION: Do you believe that your denomination is infallible? If not, could you point out which doctrine(s) you believe are in error?

In His Grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]