Quote
To quote an insistent Luther, "hoc EST"! Scripture knows nothing of Christ's body being present "in, with, and under" the bread and wine. Christ said, "This IS My body"! Nowhere did He say, "My body is present in, with, and under".


By the same logic, scripture knows nothing of the hypostatic union. The formula; in, with, and under; to describe the nature of the sacramental union is employed because many falsely accuse us of consubstantiation.

The papists correctly accept "This is My Body" literally but ignore the other text that says the bread remains bread. The Zwinglians do the very opposite. The Calvinists attempt to reconcile the two texts by separating Christ from His humanity contrary to the texts that speak of the unity of the person.

Quote
If you want to treat the text as literally as possible, then you must consider the bread itself to be the body, and the wine itself to be the blood.

No. Saying the bread is literally Christ's body would be adding to the text. The text literally says that which is distributed and received is Christ's body.