Quote
By the same logic, scripture knows nothing of the hypostatic union.

But it does. This site gives a helpful overview.

Quote
The Calvinists attempt to reconcile the two texts by separating Christ from His humanity contrary to the texts that speak of the unity of the person.

Calvinists do not separate Christ from His humanity, and you have persisted in willful misrepresentation. We say that Christ is one person with two natures, and that these natures, while joined in one person, remain distinct and unmixed. Thus the humanity of Christ is not divine, and the divinity of Christ is not humane. The communicatio idiomatum means that the attributes of both human and divine natures can be ascribed to the PERSON of Christ, as He consists of two natures; it does not mean that the each nature can be said to possess the attributes of the other!

Quote
No. Saying the bread is literally Christ's body would be adding to the text. The text literally says that which is distributed and received is Christ's body.

Sophistry, Speratus, mere sophistry! The bread and wine are distributed, and they are respectively said to BE the body and blood of Christ. If you insist on a literal interpretation as do the Romanists, you had better insist on a truly literal interpretation, and not some "half-way there" explanation.

Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.