Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,893
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,376
Posts56,576
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,047 Likes: 286
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,047 Likes: 286 |
John, I too would take exception to the two sections of the WCF that J_Edwards mentioned. For example, I do not hold that the Pope is THE "anti-Christ", but rather one of many manifestations of the [spirit] of the anti-Christ based upon: 1 John 2:18 (KJV) "Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time."
Also, I take exception to the original text of Chapter XXIII, article III on the Civil Magistrate which reads: III. The civil magistrate may not assume to himself the administration of the Word and sacraments, or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven: yet he has authority, and it is his duty, to take order that unity and peace be preserved in the Church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed, and all the ordinances of God duly settled, administrated, and observed. For the better effecting whereof, he hath power to call synods, to be present at them, and to provide that whatsoever is transacted in them be according to the mind of God.
The writers held that the civil magistrate (ruling government) has authority over such matters that concern doctrine and practice in the Church. This article was revised so as to read: Civil magistrates may not assume to themselves the administration of the Word and sacraments; or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven; or, in the least, interfere in matters of faith. Yet, as nursing fathers, it is the duty of civil magistrates to protect the church of our common Lord, without giving the preference to any denomination of Christians above the rest, in such a manner that all ecclesiastical persons whatever shall enjoy the full, free, and unquestioned liberty of discharging every part of their sacred functions, without violence or danger. And, as Jesus Christ hath appointed a regular government and discipline in his church, no law of any commonwealth should interfere with, let, or hinder, the due exercise thereof, among the voluntary members of any denomination of Christians, according to their own profession and belief. It is the duty of civil magistrates to protect the person and good name of all their people, in such an effectual manner as that no person be suffered, either upon pretense of religion or of infidelity, to offer any indignity, violence, abuse, or injury to any other person whatsoever: and to take order, that all religious and ecclesiastical assemblies be held without molestation or disturbance.
I find this to be a better summary of the biblical teaching concerning the duties and authority of government. The original was doubtless written from a Postmillennarian view which I do not believe to be correct.  In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
john
|
Sat May 07, 2005 10:28 AM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sat May 07, 2005 12:18 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
john
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:33 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:50 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat May 07, 2005 3:31 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
Anonymous
|
Sun May 08, 2005 3:56 AM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:47 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
john
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:49 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
john
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:59 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
J_Edwards
|
Sun May 08, 2005 1:08 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
john
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:40 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
John_C
|
Sun May 08, 2005 11:32 AM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
john
|
Sun May 08, 2005 12:43 PM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
John_C
|
Mon May 09, 2005 2:29 AM
|
Re: Any disagreements with the WCF?
|
Anonymous
|
Tue May 10, 2005 1:23 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
147
guests, and
23
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|