From what I understand, Kyle is quite correct. It would depend on WHICH variety of Anglican you were asking. Those who still abide by the historical formularies, the Thirty-Nine Articles, would have an understanding close to Calvin's, in all probability. But there are some who would be closer to a Roman Catholic view (in the case of some Anglo-Catholics, who would hold there are seven sacraments), and some who would be closer to a memorialist position regarding the Lord's Supper. The Anglicans who still adhere to the Articles would say there are really only two sacraments.

I begin to wonder whether Presbyterians may be moving towards just as wide a variety in their views of the sacraments, although I have yet to hear of a Presbyterian who would argue for seven sacraments. (I have only heard varying degrees of opinions about the effects of baptism and the Lord's Supper.) Probably if a Presbyterian ever got to that point he or she would have left for another church.

Theo