William Webster has written a thorough exegetical apologetic for Matt 16:18 within which is included an exegesis of Matt 18:18, which I believe should be considered together. Although he doesn't deal with what Pentecostal's do with the text, he does soundly refute the RCC's twisting of it.<br><br>You can access the article here: The Church Fathers’ Interpretation of the Rock of Matthew 16:18<br><br>I should have also included this one: Popedom Part II<br><br>In His Grace,

Last edited by Pilgrim; Sun May 11, 2003 1:03 PM.
[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]