From Greenbaggins;

The first reason why the FV is heretical is that it makes no ontological differentiation in the church between those who are hypocrites and those who are saved. FV advocates will make claims that look like this: “the only difference between hypocrites and non-hypocrites is that the non-hypocrites will persevere.”

and a little later on...

]We cannot define the church solely in terms of what is visible, or else we have no leg upon which to stand, for the Reformers did not claim continuity with Medieval Catholicism, but with the early church. How is it that they are the true church? Because they have always been the true invisible church, though they were not always visible as the church. You get rid of the visible/invisible church distinction, then you cut the leg out from under the entire Reformation.

Is 'Federal Vision' fairly represented here?

Are the objections raised correct?

Edited by Hitch (Monday, April 2, 2012 12:38 AM)
Marxism is the opiate of the academy.