Originally Posted by Hitch
Is 'Federal Vision' fairly represented here?

Are the objections raised correct?

1) I think FV is fairly represented. What the writer meant by "the first reason why..." would be interesting to know. The question that comes to my mind is, Did the writer mean by "the first reason", the primary reason? or was he simply enumerating a list of things of which this failure to distinguish between the visible and invisible Church was the first that came to mind, or perhaps this quote was simply a reply to a specific question concerning FV's view of the Church?

2. The objections are correct, as far as I'm concerned. grin

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]