Originally Posted By: Tom
I guess where I am confused is where in my post was I verifying truth by experience?

Your original statement is HERE.

And my explanation of how you essentially countered the statement: "A man with an argument is no match for a man with an experience." is HERE, where you referred to your experience of being in the Charismatic/Pentecostal movement and your experience of discussing things with others within the movement who intepret Scripture on the basis of their experience... Thus, experience trumps propositional truth and Scripture's own hermeneutic; method of interpretation.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]