I did not mean to imply that the article had anything to do with the Formal Equivalence vs the Dynamic Equivalence. The reason why I mention that was because I find that issue to be more important.
Admittedly, I only read the article once and in order for me to completely understand a message of that type, it takes at least two or three readings. In this case however, I thought I would put the article on the Highway to see if after that I should make the time to read it again.
Thankyou for pointing out that this is not a TR vs Westscott-Hort issue. My initial thoughts were that it probably was.
By the way, I agree with your rant.