I am trying to understand Theonomy especially where Bahnsen is concerned. I understand that when he was at WTS, he tried to get dialogue on the subject, but they were not interested.
If I understand Bahnsen, he believed that Theonomy was a natural out flowing of Reformed theology and Presuppositional Apologetics.
Perhaps I am missing something in the equation; but although I believe all Christians who have a high view of Scripture believe in Theonomy where their lives are concerned. Yet, it would seem in my mind anyway, the only way Theonomy would actually work beyond that is in a Theocracy.
Would I be correct to say that those like Bahnsen would advocate trying to make all society a Theocracy?