Pilgrim said:<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Peter isn't saying that these men who spoke from God were "motivated" by the Holy Spirit to write those things which they did. That is, they did not experience some impetus to write and then from their own experiences jotted down some words which seemed best to them. Rather, the word phero is to better understood as "borne along, carried, moved in the sense of transported". In short, they were guided by the Spirit to write down exactly the words which the Spirit intended to be preserved. Thus those words can be said to be "true truth"; infallible, inerrant. It was God's purpose that not one jot nor tittle should originate from the independent minds or imaginations of men. </font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>2. Is that why the gospel writers sometimes quoted Jesus differently and even gave somewhat differing accounts of events - differing in minor details, that is? And also why there were times when the apostles quoted Jesus saying things that were not in the gospels we have?<br><br>3. Do you believe that when Paul said this, that he was operating under the movement of the Holy Spirit:<br><br>" I would that ye all spake with tongues but rather that ye prophesied:..."<br> I Corinthians 14:5<br><br> If so, what has changed?
