Donations for the month of February


We have received a total of $100 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Posts: 59
Joined: April 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,605
Posts50,990
Members923
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,376
Tom 3,396
chestnutmare 2,902
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,750
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,059
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 22
Tom 20
Ruben 2
cathmg 1
Tina 1
Recent Posts
A study of the Heidelberg Catechism
by gotribe. Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:07 PM
Particular Baptists and the Nicene Creed
by Tom. Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:17 PM
Major update for the forum
by Ruben. Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:23 AM
Egalitarianism
by Pilgrim. Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:13 AM
Judge Abusing His Office
by Tom. Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:34 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Experimental Preaching Institute. #16423
Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:16 PM
Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:16 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


Deal all,

Lord willing, on Monday the 26th of July I will head down to Greenville South Carolina to attend this years Pastor's Institute. The theme of the course is "Experimental Preaching" and it is promised to be a fantastic time for learning and growth. Personally I am looking forward to studying under Dr. Joel Beeke and Dr. Joseph Pipa. If anyone is interested I will post back here when I get back the basics of the institute.

Having said that, what are your thoughts regarding experimental preaching? Does your pastor preach experimentally? Is there a healthy dose of passion and application in his preaching?

Kind regards,

Octavius
www.apcvan.ca/Jerblog

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. #16424
Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:56 PM
Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Eastern US
john Offline
Addict
john  Offline
Addict
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Eastern US
Hi Octavius,

Could you define what is meant by "experimental preaching". I'm unfamiliar with the term.

By the way, I used to live close to Greenville. It's a great place, not to small and not too big. I'm sure you'll have a wonderful time.

John

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. #16425
Wed Jul 21, 2004 7:08 AM
Wed Jul 21, 2004 7:08 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 51
Argyll, Scotland.
Saved_n_kept Offline
Member
Saved_n_kept  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 51
Argyll, Scotland.
Octavius,

There being no local church where I would feel at home, I have been listening to http://www.hnrc.org/gr/index.html and have found the preaching of Dr. Beeke a tremendous blessing. I also was greatly helped by Dr. Pipa's book 'The Lord's Day.' Will very much look forward to hearing how you enjoyed the course.
Yours in Him,
Brian.

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: john] #16426
Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:39 AM
Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:39 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


John,

Our web site has a little blurb on Experimental Preaching.

http://www.apcvan.ca/beeke.htm

Let me know your thoughts.

Kind regards,

Octavius

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: Saved_n_kept] #16427
Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:42 AM
Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:42 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


No good churches in youre area! So sad. I know that Dr. Beeke has preached a few times in our Churches in Scotland. He is a GREAT preacher.

Kind regards,

Octavius
www.apcvan.ca/Jerblog

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. #16428
Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:29 PM
Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Nashville, Tennessee
Gileskirk Offline
Newbie
Gileskirk  Offline
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Nashville, Tennessee
Am I off base in saying that it sounds a lot like topical preaching?

I don't mean that as a criticism, simply a question.

Andy

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: Gileskirk] #16429
Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:37 PM
Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,376
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,376
NH, USA
Quote
ForSBCReform said:
Am I off base in saying that it sounds a lot like topical preaching?

I don't mean that as a criticism, simply a question.

Andy

Andy,

Octavius will correct me if I'm wrong, but "Experimental Preaching" may use various methods, e.g., expository, thematic, topical, doctrinal, etc. But what makes it "experimental" is that it is applied to the heart with instructions as to how to live out that particular truth which was found in God's Word. In short, to preach "experimentally" is to call for change in the life of the hearer, whether inward, outward or both.

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: Pilgrim] #16430
Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:09 PM
Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:09 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Nashville, Tennessee
Gileskirk Offline
Newbie
Gileskirk  Offline
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Nashville, Tennessee
That makes a bit more since. I have found simple topical preaching to be a scourge on the SBC and the foundation for the seeker sensitive movement within our denomination. I think that there is a place for it, but as a singular style it leaves a lot to be desired.

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: Gileskirk] #16431
Thu Jul 22, 2004 8:10 PM
Thu Jul 22, 2004 8:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,376
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,376
NH, USA
Quote
ForSBCReform said:
That makes a bit more since. I have found simple topical preaching to be a scourge on the SBC and the foundation for the seeker sensitive movement within our denomination. I think that there is a place for it, but as a singular style it leaves a lot to be desired.

Actually, "Topical Preaching" is a legitimate method to make known God's truth. It simply means preaching from the various passages of Scripture that teach that specific topic. However, I believe what you are complaining about, and rightly so, is that many men are preaching "topics" and not expounding the actual texts in their respective contexts. Paul's admonition is to "preach the Word".... not some topic, which in most cases today is "moralizing".

The failure to preach "expositorily" doesn't belong only to contemporary, seeker-friendly churches. Many Dutch Reformed churches are likewise guilty, at least those who still adhere to the old tradition of preaching through the 52 Lord's Days of the Heidelberg Catechism. Instead of "moralizing" or telling funny stories, etc., they preach the Catechism, an uninspired document. I can't tell you how many ministers in those denominations I have conversed with and suggested that rather than preaching the Q & A of the Catechism, that they take one or more of the "proof-texts" that undergird them and preach from those texts; expound the Word of God. In this way, everyone not only is the purpose behind Catechetical preaching realized, but by preaching the Word of God itself, the promise of the Holy Spirit working in and through it is fulfilled and thus those who hear are blessed.

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. #16432
Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:22 AM
Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:22 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Eastern US
john Offline
Addict
john  Offline
Addict
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Eastern US
Hi Octavius,

Thanks for the link. It really helped explain the idea. Before reading the article, I was a little concerened because "experimental" seems to have a subjective connotation to it, i.e., preaching based on primarily one's experiences instead of Scripture. But, in reality that wasn't what is meant at all. Do you think that in light of today's culture, there may be a better way to refer to this style of preaching instead of experimental? I only say that because until one is given a good definition of what is meant by experimental preaching, the initial idea is probably not what is meant at all.

Anyway, I especially liked the following quote,

Quote
Preaching Christ. The experimental preaching of the Reformers and Puritans focused on preaching Christ. As Scripture clearly shows, evangelism must bear witness to the record God has given of his only begotten Son (Acts 2:3; 5:42; 8:35; Romans 16:25; 1 Corinthians 2:2; Galatians 3:1). The Puritans thus taught that any preaching in which Christ does not have the pre-eminence is not valid experiential preaching. William Perkins said that the heart of all preaching was to 'preach [only] one Christ by Christ to the praise of Christ'. According to Thomas Adams, 'Christ is the sum of the whole Bible, prophesied, typified, prefigured, exhibited, demonstrated, to be found in every leaf, almost in every line, the Scriptures being but as it were the swaddling bands of the child Jesus'. 'Think of Christ as the very substance, marrow, soul, and scope of the whole Scriptures', advised Isaac Ambrose. In this Christ-centred context, Reformed and Puritan evangelism was marked by a discriminating application of truth to experience.


Whenever I hear a sermon, the thing I look for the most is to hear about Christ (taught correctly of course). So often, nowadays, the experiential/experimental part is taught but Christ is left out. I really think that is wrong.

John

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: Pilgrim] #16433
Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:35 AM
Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:35 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Nashville, Tennessee
Gileskirk Offline
Newbie
Gileskirk  Offline
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Nashville, Tennessee
I don't disagree with topical preaching as a method. I do agree that it is a legitimate method, as long as the texts are properly expounded on. My complaint is, as you said, that The Word is not actually being preached; rather moral lessons that a preacher chooses to expound upon.

I can't tell you how many Sunday mornings I have sat and listened to a preacher talk about his opinion of right and wrong with weak textual proofs, followed by imploring the non-believer to "ask Jesus into your heart" and He will fix your moral dilemma. I think it is important to have topical messages on occasion, but it must be fully supported by scripture. That is my beef with modern topical preaching.

As you have explained it, as well as other things I've read since first encountering the term experimental preaching, it seems that it is much more than the simple fluff being poured out in our churches today.

Thanks for being patient with me in my ignorance.

Andy

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: john] #16434
Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:59 AM
Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:59 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,376
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,376
NH, USA
Quote
Whenever I hear a sermon, the thing I look for the most is to hear about Christ (taught correctly of course). So often, nowadays, the experiential/experimental part is taught but Christ is left out. I really think that is wrong.

I'm going to stick my neck on the proverbial "chopping block" and say that it is very possible to violate Scripture by bringing Christ explicitly into every sermon.

Why? Because if we truly hold to the inspiration of the Bible, and that each and every word was written for a specific purpose, then it is actually contradictory to bring Christ into many passages of Scripture. Yes, the revelation of God is just that, it reveals "God" and His redemption in Christ. There is, however, much more to salvation than repenting of your sins and trusting in Christ unto justification. And yes, Christ Jesus is also our sanctification (1Cor 1:30) yet it is our responsibility to live out the details of what our sanctification entails. What I'm objecting to preachers who, after every sermon, regardless of the passage being preached on, if in fact they even expound a text in its proper context, will at the end of every sermon, make a call to believe on Christ in order to be saved.

There are passages of Scripture where salvation is enjoined upon unbelievers. And these, being part of the inspired biblical record, should be preached. But the majority of Scripture is directed to believers; those who have already come to Christ, having been given a new nature by the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit. Their most pressing need is the putting off of the old man and the putting on of the new. It is here that I think preachers need to focus their efforts; e.g., encouraging those who are discouraged, weary and beaten down from being in the world with its myriad temptation. The sheep need the whole counsel of God if they are to live a godly and balanced life.


2 Timothy 3:15-17 (KJV) "And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works."



It is also true that the Lord Christ is to be our example, the perfection of all that we are to be to in Whose image we are to be conformed; yea to even be partakers of the divine nature. (2Pet 1:4) Perhaps I can best illustrate my point by simply pointing to the book of Esther. One of the reasons why this particular book caused so much controversy when it came to determining which books were to be included in the Canon, was that there is no mention of God to be found in Esther. Maybe some of you were not aware of this interesting fact? So, how is one to understand that book without even the name of God being found in it? I would suggest that the author of Esther was inspired to produce a "literary painting" . . . where God is the "canvas" upon which the "colors" of the story are penned. In other words, the LORD God was behind all that happened and it was He Who was by His providence bringing all that happened to pass. In very simple terms, in the book of Esther, God is "assumed". The writer was obviously a Presuppositionalist!

To summarize, my objection is using Christ as an "addon" to satisfy a view that believe if the name of Christ isn't mentioned in every sermon, then it isn't acceptable or "Christological". I believe we should be faithful to the text and context of every passage of Scripture. And in doing so, then we are honoring God most, upholding the doctrine of divine inspiration, and allowing the Spirit to work as He should in and through the proper exposition of the Word.

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: Pilgrim] #16435
Sat Jul 24, 2004 10:15 AM
Sat Jul 24, 2004 10:15 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,750
Mississippi Gulf Coast
John_C Offline

Permanent Resident
John_C  Offline

Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,750
Mississippi Gulf Coast
I have some followup on this. BTW, This is a nice thread, lots of interesting points.

Quote
Pilgrim says,
But what makes it "experimental" is that it is applied to the heart with instructions as to how to live out that particular truth which was found in God's Word.

What makes experimental different from say, expositional. Is it the call for application through specific instructions? My Pastor preaches expositionally basically by telling us - what does it say, what does it mean, how to apply it, and how to put it into practice. When he mentions on how to put it into practice, is that a form of experimental preaching. Or does experimental preaching goes beyond that?


John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: John_C] #16436
Sat Jul 24, 2004 2:07 PM
Sat Jul 24, 2004 2:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 103
Lenexa, Kansas
DaveVan3 Offline
Member
DaveVan3  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 103
Lenexa, Kansas

John: Here is a great article by A.W. Pink on this subject. This has been extremely helpful to me.
http://philologos.org/pink/1937/experimental_preaching2.htm

Dave

Re: Experimental Preaching Institute. [Re: DaveVan3] #16437
Sun Jul 25, 2004 3:51 AM
Sun Jul 25, 2004 3:51 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


Hi Dave,

Excellent article by A.W.Pink,he is as always crystal clear in his thoughts.My wife and daughters rave about his writings.I would highly recommend him to all easy to read but very challenging also.Would that such clarity was more common place than it is.

Y.B.I.C.
Duncan

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 124 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
robertolang, SmallFry, drewk, patrice, Robert1962
923 Registered Users
Shout Box
February
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28
Today's Birthdays
Curt
Popular Topics(Views)
702,205 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.055s Queries: 16 (0.004s) Memory: 2.9757 MB (Peak: 3.2917 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-02-19 14:25:29 UTC