Donations for the month of April


We have received a total of $100 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Anthony C.
Anthony C.
NJ/PA
Posts: 218
Joined: May 2016
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,620
Posts51,090
Members925
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,410
Tom 3,424
chestnutmare 2,910
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,754
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 18
Tom 10
cathmg 5
John_C 3
Tina 3
Kaylin 1
Recent Posts
What exactly is a confessional church
by Pilgrim. Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:33 AM
Dispensationalism
by Tom. Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:55 PM
James White Article
by Pilgrim. Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:10 PM
Importance of dating the destruction of the Temple
by Pilgrim. Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:13 PM
A study of the Heidelberg Catechism
by cathmg. Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 PM
"The Reformed View of Sanctification" - Sinclair Ferguson
by Pilgrim. Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:04 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Spurgeon a Lousy Expositor? #24075
Tue Apr 05, 2005 3:04 PM
Tue Apr 05, 2005 3:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
An anonymous blogger here made the following accusation about CH Spurgeon.
Quote
Spurgeon was just as lousy of an expositor as Rick Warren. They should have called him "The Prince of Topic Preachers." Everyone wants Spurgeon on their side, but why? After all, the guy didn't exactly "unleash God's truth one verse at a time."


What do you think about it?

I am thinking of responding to this, but thought I would check here first.

Tom

Re: Spurgeon a Lousy Expositor? [Re: Tom] #24076
Tue Apr 05, 2005 4:28 PM
Tue Apr 05, 2005 4:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Nebraska
thredj Offline
Enthusiast
thredj  Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Nebraska
Quote
What do you think about it?
<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/igiveup.gif" alt="" /> ...that's what I think about it.

Tom, I'm sure you're looking for a more intelligent answer. It is obvious, however, that this anonymous person has not read Spurgeon. To date, if we're speaking about preachers past I've not found anyone who was able to glean so much and preach it from the Scriptures. He may not have been a 'verse by verse' man like McArthur but topical preaching has its place and he was gifted in that area. Ok, that's my <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/my2cents.gif" alt="" />


tj
"-that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection..."
Re: Spurgeon a Lousy Expositor? [Re: thredj] #24077
Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:30 AM
Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Here is something that Haddon Robinson wrote about Spurgeon.

Quote
"Spurgeon, for example, preached great sermons, but he was not an expositor. It's usually hard to see how he got that sermon from that text. But he was guided by a great theology—a Reformed theology with an evangelistic thrust—and, as a result, he was a powerful preacher, just not an expositor."


The person who gave that quote from Robinson also said.


Quote
Even the Treasury of David is not an exegetical work for the most part; rather, it's a homiletical commentary. Although Spurgeon often provides some very wise statements, he was by no means the expositor of quality of Robinson, MacArthur, or Stuart Briscoe.




Tom

Last edited by Tom; Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:35 AM.
Re: Spurgeon a Lousy Expositor? [Re: Tom] #24078
Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:02 PM
Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:02 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A


I think the consensus among people I know here (in the UK), would be that Spurgeon was noted for being a preacher / evangelist rather than an expositor or theologian. Some of the Particular Baptists in England have been very scathing of him on the strength of some comments he made in sermons, but these people tend to split hairs and quibble almost gratuitously.

Re: Spurgeon a Lousy Expositor? #24079
Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:01 PM
Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
What I believe to be true of Spurgeon regardless of whether or not he preached expositional is that Spurgeon had a very high view of Scripture. He got his doctrine from Scripture and when he saw abuse such as the "down grade controversy", he spoke against it.

Tom

Philip R.Johnson's response [Re: Tom] #24080
Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:45 AM
Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:45 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,426
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
I thought you might be interested in something I found out about CH Spurgeon from Philip R. Johnson (one of the best read people on Spurgeon I know about).
I have his permission to use this information.

[quote]It's true that Spurgeon did not normally do expository preaching.
In fact, he regarded biblical exposition as something distinct
from "preaching." His approach to exposition was simply to read a
phrase and comment on it. Some of his printed sermons include an
"Exposition" section. See, for example,

http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/2258.htm#expo

...but this "exposition" was done in another part of the church
service, distinct from the preaching.

In the sermon referenced by your friend ("Things That Accompany
Salvation"), Spurgeon began by acknowledging that he was not
trying to explain the meaning of the text from which he borrowed
his title. His very first words were:

I AM not quite certain that my text will warrant all I
shall say upon it this day if read and understood in its
connection. But I have taken the words rather by
accommodation than otherwise, and shall make use of them
as a kind of heading to the discourse which I hope to be
enabled to deliver.

THAT wasn't his normal approach, either. In that sermon, he was
just borrowing a phrase from Scripture to use as a title.
Normally, he took time to carefully explain both the context and
the meaning of his text, even if he departed from there into a
topical message.

So what does this prove? It certainly dsoesn't invalidate
Spurgeon's preaching ministry. On the contrary, it simply shows
that the expository method is not the only preaching style used by
God to further the gospel. I happen to agree with those who say
expository preaching is generally superior to topical preaching.
But it's not the ONLY approach, and almost no one would argue that
it is. Even John MacArthur occasionally preaches topically.

Furthermore, there are lots of modern expositors who can't hold a
candle to Spurgeon, despite the fact that he wasn't a strict
expositor. As I said, his topical approach usually included
elements of exposition. (Before I preach on a given passage, I
always read Spurgeon to see how he dealt with it. Though my style
is certainly more expository than his, I find he often gives me
great help with the exposition of the passage.)

BTW, Spurgeon lived in an era when almost no one did straight
expository preaching. He was, in that sense, a product of his
times.

What Rick Warren does is something entirely different. My chief
objection to Warren is not that he is not an expositor, but that
he deliberately makes ANY connection to Scripture in his preaching
as tenuous as possible. He tells preachers it is unwise to begin
their sermons with Scripture. Spurgeon would rightly have
abominted such advice.

In other words, whatever else you say about Spurgeon's approach to
Scripture, you can't accuse him of not being biblical. I don't
think anyone could honestly argue that Rick Warren is biblical. He
actually seems to pride himself on the way he relegates Scripture
to a footnote in his messaages. He certainly can't be legitimately
defended by any comparison with Spurgeon.

-- Phillip R. Johnson
The Spurgeon Archive
http://www.spurgeon.org<br />
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 21 guests, and 97 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Dutch Michael, Ray, robertolang, SmallFry, drewk
925 Registered Users
Shout Box
April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
735,789 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.148s Queries: 15 (0.048s) Memory: 2.8519 MB (Peak: 3.1394 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-04-20 23:47:01 UTC