Donations for the month of November


We have received a total of $100 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
NH, USA
Posts: 13,293
Joined: April 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,533
Posts50,706
Members921
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,293
Tom 3,300
chestnutmare 2,862
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,748
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,057
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 20
Pilgrim 16
John_C 2
Recent Posts
The Church of England Announcement
by Tom. Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:11 PM
Law and Grace
by Tom. Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:56 PM
Why I hate the left
by Pilgrim. Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:42 PM
What is a missionary work
by Pilgrim. Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:07 AM
Terrorist Attacks
by AJ Castellitto. Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:08 AM
Theonomy
by Pilgrim. Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:54 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#28515 - Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:05 PM God died?  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 969
Peter Offline
Old Hand
Peter  Offline
Old Hand

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 969
USA
In a link to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Q&A regarding the peccability of Christ, (which they deny) the answer goes on to say:
Quote
Similar issues arise, of course, in connection with Jesus’ death. Though Jesus died according to his human nature, his death was the death of the God-man. We can properly say God died.
God Died?


Is this true can we claim that the Son of God died?


Peter

If you believe what you like in the gospels, and reject what you don't like, it is not the gospel you believe, but yourself. Augustine of Hippo
#28516 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:01 AM Re: God died? [Re: Peter]  

**DONOTDELETE**
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered


By "we" are you including me, the Lutheran, or just your Reformed brothers? According to Walther, 1st President of the Missouri Synod, true Reformed can't make that claim.

Quote
Justification, Fifth Western District Convention Addison Ill. Beginning May 5, 1859 , 6,III,(P)

Following Zwingli's shameful example, the Reformed sects also destroy the doctrine of justification by their false doctrine on the person of Christ. Like him, they deny to this day that God suffered for us [and] that God's blood was shed for us. Where Scripture expressly testifies to this, they want to see only a rhetorical figure of speech, which says something different from what is meant. Thus one brands the language of Holy Scripture as that of a swindler.

A mere man is said to have died for us on Golgotha . It is inconceivable how a person who claims to be a Christian could arrive at such a godless doctrine, it is true, of course, that God as such cannot die, but Christ, who is true God, could die since He had assumed human nature, so that Godhead and manhood now form one person in Him. A human being's soul as such can, of course, also not die; yet the "whole" human being, consisting of body and soul, dies, and the soul is indeed most affected thereby. So also the most important thing for us is that the One who died for us is true God. If God had not died for us, then no one would be saved. However, whereas we now can sing, to our great comfort in life and in death, “O sorrow dread! God Himself is dead; upon the cross He died," yet this very hymn is an abomination to the true Reformed.

In complete harmony with Zwingli's gross rationalism, according to which he does not seriously believe that Christ was true God and [true] man in one person, Calvin says it wouldn't help anyone if he would simply confront God with Christ, but that God accepts Christ's work as fully sufficient only because of eternal election. In his thinking, too, only a man died. "Christ is God's Son and true God” therefore even now means nothing more to the Reformed Church than that God dwelt in the Lord Jesus in a higher degree than in other people, about as He dwelt with His glory particularly in the temple at Jerusalem. But even if the Reformed say that the whole God dwelt in Jesus, they still speak of a God outside of Him. Thank God, there still are simple souls among the Reformed, who hold that it is meant seriously when also there the words are still used, "Christ is true God and man in one person," and one relies thereon in faith.

If someone were to ask how the truth that there is no God outside of Christ harmonizes with the article on the Trinity, the answer is: There is no difference in the essence of the three persons of the Godhead, which is why it also cannot be divided. Nevertheless, what appears three times in the Trinity, namely the person-hood, occurs only once in Christ. But whoever for that reason still wants to recognize God outside of Christ, eliminates the equality in essence between Son and Father and must accept either several gods or deny the true essence of the complete fullness of the Godhead in Christ [cf. Col. 2:9]. When Christ lay in the crib and hung on the cross, there was no other God than precisely the One in the crib and on the cross.

Of course, one must not bring mathematical computations to bear here. If the mystery of the Trinity would cease being a mystery to us, then we would first have to know what is mean by the words "born" and "proceeding" as used of the persons of the Godhead. And if we are asked in objection how the Godhead could have become so small as to dwell incarnate in the man Jesus, we answer: "No change took place in the Godhead through the personal union with human nature; it did not become smaller thereby, but human nature became larger. Human nature did not assume the divine nature, but the other way around: The divine nature assumed the human nature.

Zwingli would not agree that "the Word became flesh" [John 1:14 ], but held that it should only say that the Word is the flesh that is has become ("das Wort ist gewordeness Fleisch"), i.e., through the incarnation of Christ. He stopped being God, and His deity was, so to speak, transformed in Jesus into humanity (for only so was He said to be able to die), and only after that did He again become great God. So here [in Zwingli] we hear today's heterodox theology ("After-theologie").

#28517 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 9:09 AM Re: God died?  
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 351
Henry Offline
Enthusiast
Henry  Offline
Enthusiast

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 351
The Great White North, Eh!
In the first chapter of Revelation Jesus explicity refers to Himself as having died. The Bible doesn't give us any more detail past that.


(Latin phrase goes here.)
#28518 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 9:23 AM Re: God died?  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
CovenantInBlood Offline
Persnickety Presbyterian
CovenantInBlood  Offline
Persnickety Presbyterian


Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
Virginia
Speratus,

Interesting you should affirm this language, given that God is immortal, don't you think? Aren't you dividing the two natures of Christ by saying that He was able to die, just like some do by saying that He was able to sin?


Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
#28519 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:36 PM Re: God died?  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,293
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,293
NH, USA
Speratus,

Once again, as is typical of the Lutherans, yourself included, the error of not properly distinguishing between the two natures of Christ, i.e., the hypostatic union of the Lord Jesus Christ is revealed. Charles Hodge in his Systematic Theology has a very instructive and biblically sound section on the "Person of Christ", in Vol. II pp. 378-454. He also deals extensively with the Lutheran view and exposes their errors as well on pp. 407-418. But as to the topic at hand, "Did God Die?", Hodge addresses this directly on pp. 392-394. See the attached .pdf document, "Communion of attributes".

In His grace,

Attached Files

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#28520 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:19 PM Re: God died? [Re: CovenantInBlood]  
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,578
MarieP Offline
Permanent Resident
MarieP  Offline
Permanent Resident

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,578
Kentucky
R. C. Sproul once said somewhere that he thinks the line in "And Can It Be" that says "that Thou my God should die for me" should be changed.

Aggree or disagree?


True godliness is a sincere feeling which loves God as Father as much as it fears and reverences Him as Lord, embraces His righteousness, and dreads offending Him worse than death~ Calvin
#28521 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:18 PM Re: God died? [Re: MarieP]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856
Wes Offline
Needs to get a Life
Wes  Offline
Needs to get a Life

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856
Northwest Indiana, USA
Quote
SemperReformanda said:

R. C. Sproul once said somewhere that he thinks the line in "And Can It Be" that says "that Thou my God should die for me" should be changed.

Aggree or disagree?


I disagree. I think the words of that song beautifully express a deep gratitude to God for providing so great a salvation. Hallelujah!

And Can It Be

Matthew 1:23 “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us.”


Wes


When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts
#28522 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:59 PM Re: God died? [Re: MarieP]  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
CovenantInBlood Offline
Persnickety Presbyterian
CovenantInBlood  Offline
Persnickety Presbyterian


Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
Virginia
Quote
SemperReformanda said:
R. C. Sproul once said somewhere that he thinks the line in "And Can It Be" that says "that Thou my God should die for me" should be changed.

Aggree or disagree?


Not really, since Jesus Christ, who is our God, did die.


Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
#28523 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 9:11 PM Re: God died? [Re: MarieP]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,293
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,293
NH, USA
I too disagree, but with this stipulation; that before the hymn is sung the preacher should take a little time to explain the relationship which existed in Christ Jesus, He being God and man and that it was the human nature only that died on the cross since God cannot die. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> What a perfect opportunity to teach some Christology and upbuild the saints. A morsel of "meat" is good for the soul. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

In His grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#28524 - Sat Oct 15, 2005 11:45 PM Re: God died? [Re: CovenantInBlood]  

**DONOTDELETE**
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote
CovenantInBlood said:
Speratus,

Interesting you should affirm this language, given that God is immortal, don't you think? Aren't you dividing the two natures of Christ by saying that He was able to die, just like some do by saying that He was able to sin?


Scripture shows the divine nature appropriating to itself the purely human attribute of dying (e.g., Acts 3:15, 1 Corinthians 2:8,Romans 8:32, etc.). The divine nature never appropriates to itself an ability to sin. Impecability, unlike mortality, is not a exclusively divine or human attribute (Eph. 1:3-6, Rom. 8:28-30) but is an attribute of both natures of Christ.  

Last edited by speratus; Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:54 AM.
#28525 - Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:58 AM Re: God died?  

**DONOTDELETE**
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote
speratus said:
Scripture shows the divine nature appropriating to itself the purely human attribute of dying (e.g., Acts 3:15, 1 Corinthians 2:8,Romans 8:32, etc.). The divine nature never appropriates to itself an ability to sin. Impecability, unlike mortality, is not a exclusively divine or human attribute (Eph. 1:3-6, Rom. 8:28-30) but is an attribute of both natures of Christ.


So if the Divine nature of Christ died who kept the world from ending. In Hebrews it says:
Heb 1:3 who being the shining splendor of His glory, and the express image of His essence, and upholding all things by the word of His power,

#28526 - Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:45 AM Re: God died?  

**DONOTDELETE**
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered


Walther in my above citation answers your objection: ". . . it is true, of course, that God as such cannot die, but Christ, who is true God, could die since He had assumed human nature, so that Godhead and manhood now form one person in Him. A human being's soul as such can, of course, also not die; yet the "whole" human being, consisting of body and soul, dies, and the soul is indeed most affected thereby. So also the most important thing for us is that the One who died for us is true God. If God had not died for us, then no one would be saved."

Let me add that human mortality never becomes a divine property ("God as such can not die"). In personal union, the divine nature appropriates to itself human mortality (i.e., God is man and this man is God).

The death of a mere man, due to its finite nature, would not atone for the sins of a single person. But, be of good cheer! The Word was made flesh (John 1:14). The death of the man Christ Jesus, God's death, is of infinite worth (John 1:29).

#28527 - Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:36 PM Re: God died?  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
CovenantInBlood Offline
Persnickety Presbyterian
CovenantInBlood  Offline
Persnickety Presbyterian


Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
Virginia
Quote
speratus said:
Let me add that human mortality never becomes a divine property ("God as such can not die").


This is no different than what I and others have said with regard to Christ's peccability, and yet we are accused of Nestorianism. "Human peccability never becomes a divine property ('God as such cannot sin')"!

Quote
In personal union, the divine nature appropriates to itself human mortality (i.e., God is man and this man is God).


And this is precisely the problem with your Christology; it is exactly what horrifies you about the position that Christ was peccable, for you confuse the natures of Christ by attributing mortality to His divinity. Little wonder, then, that you should think we attribute peccability to His divinity!


Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
#28528 - Sun Oct 16, 2005 4:00 PM Re: God died?  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
J_Edwards Offline
Needs to get a Life
J_Edwards  Offline
Needs to get a Life

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
USA
See Attachment! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/hello.gif" alt="" />

Attached Files

Reformed and Always Reforming,
#28529 - Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:27 PM Re: God died? [Re: CovenantInBlood]  

**DONOTDELETE**
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote
CovenantInBlood said:
Quote
speratus said:
Let me add that human mortality never becomes a divine property ("God as such can not die").


This is no different than what I and others have said with regard to Christ's peccability, and yet we are accused of Nestorianism. "Human peccability never becomes a divine property ('God as such cannot sin')"!


I actually agree with your statement in the abstract, "Human peccability never becomes a divine property." And it is equally true that "Human impeccability never becomes a divine property."

Quote
CovenantInBlood said:
Quote
speratus said:
In personal union, the divine nature appropriates to itself human mortality (i.e., God is man and this man is God).


And this is precisely the problem with your Christology; it is exactly what horrifies you about the position that Christ was peccable, for you confuse the natures of Christ by attributing mortality to His divinity.


Mutatable human properties of mortality/immortality and human peccability/impeccability never become divine properties. In the hypostatic union, the divine nature appropriates to itself human mortality not human immortality, peccability, or impeccability.


Quote
CovenantInBlood said:
Little wonder, then, that you should think we attribute peccability to His divinity!


No, I don't think you mean to do that. You have an inconsistant Christology, a Christ with a dual personality. The human nature and the divine nature of Christ have one personality, Impeccability, or else there would be two persons. The divine nature appropriating to itself human mortality does not split the personality of the person.

Last edited by speratus; Mon Oct 17, 2005 4:26 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 15 guests, and 82 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
drewk, patrice, Robert1962, Ron, billmcginnis
921 Registered Users
Shout Box
November
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
650,451 Gospel truth
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.053s Queries: 18 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7070 MB (Peak: 3.0212 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-11-18 21:31:28 UTC