Donations for the month of July


We have received a total of $185 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Featured Member
Registered: Tuesday, April 3, 2001
Posts: 13729
Forum Stats
872 Members
30 Forums
6209 Topics
48712 Posts

Max Online: 64 @ Tuesday, January 19, 2016 5:52 PM
Top Posters
Pilgrim 13729
J_Edwards 4843
Tom 4172
Wes 3553
chestnutmare 2725
CovenantInBlood 2375
MarieP 2311
RJ_ 2288
John_C 2028
gotribe 1780
Top Posters (30 Days)
Pilgrim 46
Meta4 23
Mckinley 20
Tom 17
AJ Castellitto 12
Robin 7
chestnutmare 6
John_C 4
Johan 3
BereanMe 3
Recent Posts
Speaking of Baptist
by ATulipNotADaisy
33 minutes 35 seconds ago
Are you Reformed?
by Pilgrim
Friday, July 22, 2016 11:51 AM
World Reformed Fellowship Network Statement of Faith
by Johan
Monday, July 18, 2016 10:19 PM
We Reflect What We Worship
by Pilgrim
Saturday, July 16, 2016 1:39 PM
Show me your fruit
by Pilgrim
Saturday, July 16, 2016 5:52 AM
what is theonomy?
by Pilgrim
Friday, July 15, 2016 8:38 PM
Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#39535 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 12:54 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho

Registered: Tuesday, April 3, 2001
Posts: 13729
Loc: NH, USA
Quote:
xyz said:
I think a grin is the right response to Mr Owen's offering.

And thank you for the welcome.

There's no charge for the welcome. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Now, as to a <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> being the right response to John Owen's statement concerning Christ's atonement, I confess I don't grasp what you mean by that. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/stupidme.gif" alt="" /> Would you be so kind as to elucidate?

In His grace,
_________________________


simul iustus et peccator


Top
#39536 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 1:21 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: Pilgrim]
xyz Offline


Registered: Sunday, June 1, 2008
Posts: 71
Loc: EU based
Quote:
Pilgrim said:
Quote:
xyz said:
I think a grin is the right response to Mr Owen's offering.

And thank you for the welcome.

There's no charge for the welcome. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Now, as to a <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> being the right response to John Owen's statement concerning Christ's atonement, I confess I don't grasp what you mean by that. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/stupidme.gif" alt="" /> Would you be so kind as to elucidate?

After you (or someone) has dealt with the content of my post, I don't think it will be necessary.

Top
#39537 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 1:28 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho

Registered: Tuesday, April 3, 2001
Posts: 13729
Loc: NH, USA
Quote:
xyz said:
After you (or someone) has dealt with the content of my post, I don't think it will be necessary.

Unfortunately, I am but a simple and elderly man who does find it necessary that you explain what you meant. I would truly like to understand you but at this point I cannot. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />

In His grace,
_________________________


simul iustus et peccator


Top
#39538 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 2:33 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
jaf Offline
Plebeian

Registered: Thursday, June 28, 2007
Posts: 18
Loc: maine
xyz,

I've never read anything by Owen that brought a grin to my face. He's very sober. Your post isn't as clear as you may think. Please go into more detail. It's hard to get the point or point's you're trying to make. jaf

Top
#39539 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 2:49 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: jaf]
xyz Offline


Registered: Sunday, June 1, 2008
Posts: 71
Loc: EU based
Quote:
jaf said:
Your post isn't as clear as you may think.

Why is that?

Top
#39540 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 3:04 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho

Registered: Tuesday, April 3, 2001
Posts: 13729
Loc: NH, USA
Quote:
xyz said:
Quote:
jaf said:
Your post isn't as clear as you may think.

Why is that?

I can think of a few reasons, although there may be more:

1. The reader(s) are not familiar with your writing style, or
2. The writer has difficulty expressing his/her thoughts cogently in regard to the readership, or
3. The writer is being evasive for some reason.

Whatever the reason what IS clear is that some of us here are having a difficult time understanding your response(s), particularly your statement that a "smile" icon is sufficient an answer to what you think of John Owen's For Whom Did Christ Die?.

In His grace,
_________________________


simul iustus et peccator


Top
#39541 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 3:13 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: Pilgrim]
chestnutmare Offline



Registered: Monday, September 8, 2003
Posts: 2725
Loc: NH
Thank you. I have read this post a few times and cannot understand what is meant. I was afraid it was just me. So…if it wouldn't be too much trouble, please explain.

Patrice
_________________________
The Chestnut Mare
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by frost.
- - - -JRR Tolkien "Lord of the Rings"

Top
#39542 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 3:23 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: Pilgrim]
xyz Offline


Registered: Sunday, June 1, 2008
Posts: 71
Loc: EU based
Quote:
Pilgrim said:
Quote:
xyz said:
Quote:
jaf said:
Your post isn't as clear as you may think.

Why is that?

I can think of a few reasons, although there may be more:

1. The reader(s) are not familiar with your writing style, or
2. The writer has difficulty expressing his/her thoughts cogently in regard to the readership, or
3. The writer is being evasive for some reason.

4. The two readers are insufficiently educated theologically to understand the post. One of them has, in effect admitted this. They are both evidently competent with ordinary English, so dictionary.com or similar is their first resort, if they genuinely have comprehension difficulties.

5. The readers are being evasive for some reason. This is a standard reaction when people are completely defeated, and is by no means unusual on the 'net. It is almost always the reason when people simply declare incomprehension without reason. Genuine incomprehension almost invariably asks for a particular word or phrase to be explained, especially when a reason is requested.

Top
#39543 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 3:37 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho

Registered: Tuesday, April 3, 2001
Posts: 13729
Loc: NH, USA
Quote:
xyz said:
4. The two readers are insufficiently educated theologically to understand the post. One of them has, in effect admitted this. They are both evidently competent with ordinary English, so dictionary.com or similar is their first resort, if they genuinely have comprehension difficulties.

Certainly, this is a real possibility. However, I can say without hesitation that this reason (insufficient theological education) does not apply to any of the three individuals who have asked for clarification.

Quote:
xyz further comments:
5. The readers are being evasive for some reason. This is a standard reaction when people are completely defeated, and is by no means unusual on the 'net. It is almost always the reason when people simply declare incomprehension without reason. Genuine incomprehension almost invariably asks for a particular word or phrase to be explained, especially when a reason is requested.

This too is a real possibility, although once again, it incontrovertibly does not apply here since the request for clarification by all has been genuine. Contrariwise, your responses have been anything but helpful in answering those queries, the original context which originated the issue being:


Question: From your response I am curious to know how you deal with John Owen's statement here: For Whom Did Christ Die?. (Pilgrim)

Answer: I think a grin is the right response to Mr Owen's offering. (xyz)



PS. You have a PM (Private Message) waiting a response also. Click the flashing envelope icon on the upper right-hand side of the page under your username. grin

In His grace,
_________________________


simul iustus et peccator


Top
#39544 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 3:42 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: Pilgrim]
xyz Offline


Registered: Sunday, June 1, 2008
Posts: 71
Loc: EU based
Quote:
Pilgrim said:
Quote:
xyz further comments:
5. The readers are being evasive for some reason. This is a standard reaction when people are completely defeated, and is by no means unusual on the 'net. It is almost always the reason when people simply declare incomprehension without reason. Genuine incomprehension almost invariably asks for a particular word or phrase to be explained, especially when a reason is requested.

This too is a real possibility, although once again, it incontrovertibly does not apply here since the request for clarification by all has been genuine. [/quote]
How can the reader know that?

Top
#39545 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 3:59 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho

Registered: Tuesday, April 3, 2001
Posts: 13729
Loc: NH, USA
Quote:
xyz said:

Quote:
xyz further comments:
5. The readers are being evasive for some reason. This is a standard reaction when people are completely defeated, and is by no means unusual on the 'net. It is almost always the reason when people simply declare incomprehension without reason. Genuine incomprehension almost invariably asks for a particular word or phrase to be explained, especially when a reason is requested.

Quote:
Pilgrim responds:
This too is a real possibility, although once again, it incontrovertibly does not apply here since the request for clarification by all has been genuine.

How can the reader know that?

Well, since I am one of those readers I am quite certain that my query is genuine.

Seriously, I really don't have time for silly games. If you don't care to clarify your response that is acceptable. But a word to that point would be appreciated.

In His grace,
_________________________


simul iustus et peccator


Top
#39546 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 4:04 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life

Registered: Sunday, April 8, 2001
Posts: 4172
Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
xyz

I have read your posts, but I am at a loss to understand what you are getting at.
I had thought that it might be just me, but judging from others responses, I don't believe that is the case.

So unless you have come to this thread/board to cause trouble, I would ask that you make yourself clear.
If you are here to cause trouble, I doubt very much your stay here will be a long one.

Tom

Top
#39547 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 4:30 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: Tom]
xyz Offline


Registered: Sunday, June 1, 2008
Posts: 71
Loc: EU based
Quote:
Tom said:
xyz

I have read your posts, but I am at a loss to understand what you are getting at.
I had thought that it might be just me, but judging from others responses, I don't believe that is the case.

So unless you have come to this thread/board to cause trouble

But you said that you didn't know what I was getting at.

Top
#39548 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 5:00 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: Pilgrim]
xyz Offline


Registered: Sunday, June 1, 2008
Posts: 71
Loc: EU based
Quote:
Pilgrim said:
Quote:
xyz said:

Quote:
xyz further comments:
5. The readers are being evasive for some reason. This is a standard reaction when people are completely defeated, and is by no means unusual on the 'net. It is almost always the reason when people simply declare incomprehension without reason. Genuine incomprehension almost invariably asks for a particular word or phrase to be explained, especially when a reason is requested.

Quote:
Pilgrim responds:
This too is a real possibility, although once again, it incontrovertibly does not apply here since the request for clarification by all has been genuine.

How can the reader know that?

Well, since I am one of those readers I am quite certain that my query is genuine.

Seriously, I really don't have time for silly games.

This seems to me to be precisely one of those. But we shall see.

'Christ died for all sins, past, present, future.'

That much is clear, surely?

'No-one can claim impunity against God.'

That means that no-one can say they sinned against God and got away with it. (If they could, they would be God.)

'However, not all will escape condemnation, because to reject substitutionary propitiation'

That means to reject the 'payment' made on one's behalf, like refusing a governor's pardon because you reckon you had not committed a crime.

'is to put oneself under law,'

As Paul wrote.

'and all under law are condemned, except Christ.'

As Paul wrote.

'So justice is perfectly served.'

As should now be clear, it it wasn't before.

Now, deal with all of that, and if you can then with reason claim that Owen is relevant, fair enough.

Top
#39549 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 5:15 PM Re: For Whom Did Christ Die? [Re: xyz]
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life

Registered: Sunday, April 8, 2001
Posts: 4172
Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Quote:
xyz said:
Quote:
Tom said:
xyz

I have read your posts, but I am at a loss to understand what you are getting at.
I had thought that it might be just me, but judging from others responses, I don't believe that is the case.

So unless you have come to this thread/board to cause trouble

But you said that you didn't know what I was getting at.


dizzy ..... igiveup

Top
Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >



Who's Online
0 registered (), 28 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
zsdotson11, Elwin, JohannSA, Fran44, kril8150
872 Registered Users
Shout Box

July
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
D.J.
(Views)Popular Topics
Is man required to "choose" in order to be saved? 894934
Westminster Larger Catechism 661819
...The people miscalled Antinomians ? 616551
Roman Catholicism and salvation 508236
Double predestination 476921
The importance of going to church 423826
Gospel truth 407199
"Christ died in a general way for all."? 383681
Creation 332081
Continuity in Old and NT 321430