Forum Search
Member Spotlight
SovereignGrace
SovereignGrace
Crum, WVa, USA
Posts: 118
Joined: July 2025
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,375
Posts56,575
Members992
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,045
Tom 4,893
chestnutmare 3,466
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,906
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,080
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 34
Tom 3
John_C 2
Robin 1
Recent Posts
The Glorious Security of the Children of God
by NetChaplain - Mon Jun 08, 2026 11:52 AM
"There fell down many slain, because the war was of God."
by Pilgrim - Mon Jun 08, 2026 7:47 AM
"Ye that love the Lord hate evil."
by Pilgrim - Sun Jun 07, 2026 6:54 AM
Facts From Colossians
by NetChaplain - Fri Jun 05, 2026 11:23 AM
"The Lord shut him in."
by Pilgrim - Fri Jun 05, 2026 5:09 AM
"The kindness and love of God our Saviour."
by Pilgrim - Thu Jun 04, 2026 6:33 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Hitch #47464 Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:17 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 969
Old Hand
Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 969
There is a statement made for those that have just switched to the monergistic view of salvation it is called the "cage stage". Speaking as a partial preterist non-theonomic postmillennialist with amillennial sympathizes (I stole that from Frank Turk and switched the phrases) perhaps the same should be done with those who discover the preterist view of hermenuetics. I seem to recall much of the same conversation that Hitch had with Pilgrim when I talked about postmillennialism back in the day.

Frankly with the various competing views on eschatology and not just the big ones (pre, a, post) there is more heat and not much light as far as I can see being shed anymore. There are more important doctrines then dating when Christ returns.



Peter

If you believe what you like in the gospels, and reject what you don't like, it is not the gospel you believe, but yourself. Augustine of Hippo
Robin #47467 Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
Hitch Offline OP
Addict
OP Offline
Addict
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
Originally Posted by Robin
Isn't it possible that many of these Scriptures have multiple meanings? For example, Jesus quotes Daniel in Matthew 24 refurring to some event future to His earthly ministry, yet we also know from history that the Daniel passage ("the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place") was fulfilled by Antiochus Epiphanes before the incarnation. And again in 70 AD when Jerusalem was sacked. Could there be a third instance yet future? For other passages as well?

Y'all are a lot smarter than I am... I hardly feel qualified to enter into this conversation. But I wonder if a lot of the "already and not yet" eschetological passages have multiple fulfillments, perhaps both figurative and literal.
That may be true of some things but there was only first century Israel that saw Christ and His miracles and heard Him teach,in the flesh ,and murdered Him. No other generation, or nation is or could ever be capable of the regicide, and that is the crime Jesus built His parables around (Landowner's Son, Vine dresser ).Jesus also said ,speaking of the Destruction ,that it would be a unique event in history.

Last edited by Hitch; Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:16 AM.
Peter #47468 Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
Hitch Offline OP
Addict
OP Offline
Addict
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
Originally Posted by Peter
There is a statement made for those that have just switched to the monergistic view of salvation it is called the "cage stage". Speaking as a partial preterist non-theonomic postmillennialist with amillennial sympathizes (I stole that from Frank Turk and switched the phrases) perhaps the same should be done with those who discover the preterist view of hermenuetics. I seem to recall much of the same conversation that Hitch had with Pilgrim when I talked about postmillennialism back in the day.

Frankly with the various competing views on eschatology and not just the big ones (pre, a, post) there is more heat and not much light as far as I can see being shed anymore. There are more important doctrines then dating when Christ returns.
Some things need to be confronted and the position that the Second Advent had taken place in the first century is one of them. Im not so much concerned with those who come on a forum promoting it as with the lurkers. There are often many more folks who read posts and seldom respond. They come in to see whether or not the screwballs have any standing and how they can be dealt with.

Last edited by Hitch; Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:45 AM.
Hitch #47474 Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
Hitch Offline OP
Addict
OP Offline
Addict
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371

Hitch #47529 Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
Hitch Offline OP
Addict
OP Offline
Addict
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 371
On the other side it s always a crack up when the dispensationalsit has to admit that he cant define this as the Second Advent.

16For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,750 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
June
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,892,118 Gospel truth