Donations for the month of January


We have received a total of $120 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
John_C
John_C
Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,750
Joined: September 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,585
Posts50,923
Members922
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,351
Tom 3,371
chestnutmare 2,895
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,750
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,057
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 46
Pilgrim 37
John_C 2
Kaylin 2
Meta4 1
Recent Posts
Jesus vs Paul and the Church
by Pilgrim. Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:09 AM
John the Baptist
by Meta4. Mon Jan 15, 2018 3:53 PM
Paul on a Young Earth
by Pilgrim. Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:23 PM
Oregon Baker's ordered to pay 135k
by Anthony C.. Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:48 PM
Contemplative Spirituality and Theistic Evolution
by Tom. Mon Jan 08, 2018 10:20 PM
Fear of man
by Tom. Sat Jan 06, 2018 11:50 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
#54632 - Mon Jan 01, 2018 7:49 PM Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline
Needs to get a Life

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...

I am having a discussion with someone who quite frankly is not a fan of Francis Schaeffer.
He is of the opinion that Dr. Francis Schaeffer despite his claims to be a Presuppositionist was more an evidentialist. He went onto say that Schaeffer did not believe the Scriptures were the ultimate authority.
My understanding of Schaeffer is that he was a modified Presupositionist. He did believe in the ultimate authority of Scripture, yet he also believed in more evidence than Vantil would be comfortable with.
Vantil of course was not adverse to using evidence; yet because people know the truth yet suppress the truth in unrighteousness; he argued from that basis.
I am not not sure I could describe Schaeffer's view especially in a format like this. If I tired I would probably butcher it.
I of course agree with Vantil, but I do not think it is fair to say that Schaeffer did not hold to the Scriptures being the ultimate authority.

I am not an expert on Schaeffer and don't pretend to be. I am also under no illusions that a discussion like this will change anyone's opinion. I also do not want to spend too much time on this matter, because there are more important issues to attend to. Yet, I want to be reasonably sure, I understand the issue.
If you know anything about this matter, that might be helpful, please say it.

#54634 - Mon Jan 01, 2018 10:10 PM Re: Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics [Re: Tom]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,351
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,351
NH, USA
I have never read ANYTHING in the books I have read which Francis Schaeffer wrote that would even hint that he didn't hold to the divine inspiration of the Bible and that it was the sole and final authority in all matters of faith and practice. If he didn't believe that the Scriptures were the "ultimate authority", he kept that well hidden, at least from me. When I spoke with him personally, years ago he certainly was 100% orthodox on this doctrine.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#54635 - Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:17 PM Re: Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline
Needs to get a Life

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
The more I read what that person says; although he is very well versed on Presuppositionalism. I get the feeling he has a very low opinion of anyone who might not be a Van Till Presuppositionist. He is also a Theonomist; which he believes is a natural working out of Presuppositionalism and Postmillennialism. .He has not stated so, however I think he would have said similar things about RC Sproul not believing that the Scriptures are the ultimate authority. That is speculation on my part and I might be wrong, but if he said it of Schaeffer, he would probably say it of Sproul.
Sproul of course was not a Presuppositionalist; yet anyone who has read or listened to him long enough knows how high he places the Scriptures. Much of what I have learned about the inspiration and inerrancy of Scripture was from his writings. To quote him: "God's Word is inerrant because God can not err!" Simple, but profound.
Also, if anyone has ever heard or read RC Sproul's exposition on Romans chapter one; they would be left wondering (at least I was) why he was not a Presuppossitionalist in his apologetics. I guess we all have our blind spots.
I did hear part of the reason why he was a Classical Apologist, is because of his mentor John Gerstner who was his prof at Westminster (sorry if I got the seminary name wrong). Whereas Bahnsen, Rushdoony and Gary North were schooled under Van Till. A side note, is that although Bahnsen, Rushnoony and North became Reconstructionists; Van Til did not go that far and spoke out against Rushnoony and his son-in law Gary North on their political views.
Rushnoony has even spoke out against Amillennialism; calling it blasphemy.

By the way, I have decided not to continue in that conversation with him.

Tom

Last edited by Tom; Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:19 PM.
#54637 - Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:29 AM Re: Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics [Re: Tom]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,351
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,351
NH, USA
FYI, R.C. Sproul, Sr. met (was dragged into his office) Dr. John Gerstner at Pittsburgh-Xenia Theological Seminary, now Pittsburg Theological Seminary. The school was and remains VERY liberal theologically and politically. Why John Gerstner was teaching Church History there is a mystery to me since he was VERY conservative. But why Sproul enrolled at Pittsburg-Xenia is yet another mystery, although perhaps he has mentioned why he chose to go there and I've simply forgotten, which would be no surprise to me. giggle I do have an audio lecture by Sproul where he retells his meeting with Gerstner who took him under his caring wing and how liberal the school was. Methinks that it was a lecture on biblical inspiration/inerrancy, but again, I could be mistaken on that too. But I do cleary remember him speaking of how he was mentored by John Gerstner at the seminary. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#54640 - Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:55 AM Re: Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics [Re: Tom]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline
Needs to get a Life

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
I guess the reason why I mentioned Gerstner mentoring Sproul, was because Gerstner and Sproul were both Classical in their apologetics. At least from the information I read.

Tom

#54641 - Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:26 PM Re: Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics [Re: Tom]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,351
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,351
NH, USA
Yes, both used the Classical method. In case you didn't know... Gerstner was a student of Van Til. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#54642 - Wed Jan 03, 2018 1:43 AM Re: Francis Schaeffer and his apologetics [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline
Needs to get a Life

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,371
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
No I did not know that. That is interesting; I am wondering what made Gerstner a Classical Apologist?
Tom


Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 18 guests, and 107 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
SmallFry, drewk, patrice, Robert1962, Ron
922 Registered Users
Shout Box
January
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Today's Birthdays
belovedword
Popular Topics(Views)
685,535 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.043s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 2.5961 MB (Peak: 2.8809 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-18 23:33:57 UTC