Donations for the month of June


We have received a total of "$25" in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
NH, USA
Posts: 13,783
Joined: April 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics7,039
Posts52,440
Members946
Most Online523
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,783
Tom 3,831
chestnutmare 3,036
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,799
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 11
Tom 3
Recent Posts
The Mute Christian Under The Smarting Rod
by Rick Bates. Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:39 PM
Matthew 12:40
by rstrats. Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:44 PM
"The Sinfulness of Sin" by WTG Shedd
by Pilgrim. Mon Jun 01, 2020 7:32 AM
Total Depravity
by Pilgrim. Sun May 31, 2020 8:26 PM
The Keys Of Death Are In The Savior's Hands
by Rick Bates. Sat May 30, 2020 2:05 PM
Justification And Preaching
by Rick Bates. Mon May 25, 2020 7:33 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Classical Apologetics #55585
Wed Jul 31, 2019 1:28 AM
Wed Jul 31, 2019 1:28 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,831
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,831
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Recently I was talking to some fans of Classical Apologetics. One of the things I have learned in the past was from VanTil, who stated that Natural Theology which Aquinas came up with; should have no part of Reformed Theology. Unfortunately I can't remember the reason he said this.

I told them this and the following is the answer I received.

Quote
How could it be against Reformed theology when none of the Reformers nor the most prominent systematic theologies, nor any of the confessions teach against natural theology?

It is only recently, since the advent of presuppositionalism with Van Til that Natural Theology has come under question. The arguments against it that I have seen are mostly straw men arguments against some notion of Natural Theology in the arminian sense that teaches that man can know God in a saving way through natural theology. That is not what Aquinas taught, nor implied.


Another person said that the Westminster divines quoted Aquinas favorably concerning natural theology.

Does anyone know how to respond to this?

Tom

Re: Classical Apologetics [Re: Tom] #55586
Wed Jul 31, 2019 6:48 AM
Wed Jul 31, 2019 6:48 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,783
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,783
NH, USA
The debate between Classical, Evidential and Presuppositional apologetics is one which will never end until the Lord comes. To me, the answer is quite simple... The Bible is divinely INSPIRED, i.e., God deliberately, by the Holy Spirit put into writing the infallible and inerrant TRUTH concerning all things which He desires to reveal about Himself, the world and what is required of man, including the fundamental questions concerning salvation, etc. The natural world is no less fallen and corrupted than mankind who brought about the sorry state in which we are born. There may be certain facts which can be observed in general, e.g., God's existence; His eternal power and Godhead through the things which are made (Rom 1), but even those undeniable facts will not and cannot be received as truth, as the inspired Paul also wrote immediately thereafter in Romans 1.

Let me put this another way. A reprobate liberal unbelieving professor teaching in a godless seminary man utter some "truth" but I would hardly depend upon him for a source of truth. And the only way that I know that his teachings are true or false is by testing them by the TRUTH which is found in Scripture (Jh 8:31,32, 17:17; 1Jh 4:1;i et al). It is only through the eyes that can see, a mind that can understand and ears that can hear (regeneration) can anyone even begin to comprehend the things which are called "Natural Theology", but are those things what God has ordained and given to mankind to discover and learn infallible and inerrant truth? scratchchin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 55 guests, and 16 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
David Clarke, CharlieFry, Michaelpatrick, ROB, Rick Bates
946 Registered Users
Shout Box
June
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
1,087,014 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.043s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 2.8176 MB (Peak: 3.0771 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2020-06-06 00:17:28 UTC