Donations for the month of November

We have received a total of "$25" in donations towards our goal of $175.

Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Member Spotlight
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 3,896
Joined: April 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Most Online523
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,851
Tom 3,895
chestnutmare 3,042
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,803
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 14
Recent Posts
A Direct Threat to Christian Education
by Tom. Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:06 PM
An Accusation against Amil
by Tom. Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:47 PM
Dr. Jay Adams
by Tom. Wed Nov 18, 2020 8:53 PM
Education and the US Constution
by Tom. Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:23 PM
News Paper Article
by Tom. Thu Nov 05, 2020 9:18 PM
The Foundation of the Assurance of Faith - L. Berkhof
by Pilgrim. Sun Nov 01, 2020 6:50 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Protection against paedo-communion #55664
Tue Sep 17, 2019 6:24 PM
Tue Sep 17, 2019 6:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,803
Mississippi Gulf Coast
John_C Offline OP

Permanent Resident
John_C  Offline OP

Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,803
Mississippi Gulf Coast
Is one of the primary reasons why OPC and PCA churches fence the table by saying something like 'a member in good standing in a Bible-believing church' to keep out the practice of paedo-communion? Some may want to only fence the table by saying only baptized believers which would give some ammunition or those who practice paedo-communion.

Maybe I'm overstaning primary reason, but it is important to rule out paedo-communion.

John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
Re: Protection against paedo-communion [Re: John_C] #55665
Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:18 AM
Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:18 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,851
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,851
Things have changed greatly over the past 50 years in both denominations, and not for the better unfortunately. So, it is near impossible for me personally to be able to say with any confidence what the actual reason is for their fencing the table. shrug The biblical reason for the practice used to be based upon,

1 Corinthians 11:27-29 (ASV) "27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat the bread or drink the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man prove himself, and so let him eat of the bread, and drink of the cup. 29 For he that eateth and drinketh, eateth and drinketh judgment unto himself, if he discern not the body."

In short, those who desired to participate in the Lord's Supper must be able to provide a credible profession of faith and not be under biblical discipline from another recognized church. Intellectually, the individual must have a reasonable understanding of salvation and of the sacrament/ordinance.

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Re: Protection against paedo-communion [Re: John_C] #55794
Mon Dec 09, 2019 10:18 AM
Mon Dec 09, 2019 10:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 428
South Dakota
li0scc0 Offline
li0scc0  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 428
South Dakota
I actually thought it was a somewhat weak position. If TULIP is important (and it is), I've never understood why Reformed Churches wouldn't only allow communion for members and/or members in churches with 'similar enough' theological tenets (e.g. PRCA, RCUS, OPC, etc.).

Last edited by li0scc0; Mon Dec 09, 2019 10:18 AM. Reason: missed a word!

Grace is not common.

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Tom), 59 guests, and 116 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
tomatoetom, tulsaep, PaulOR, godrulez, Wood
951 Registered Users
Shout Box
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Today's Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
1,169,005 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.043s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 2.8267 MB (Peak: 3.0967 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2020-11-30 04:26:38 UTC