Donations for the month of April


We have received a total of $0 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Posts: 2,910
Joined: September 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,620
Posts51,087
Members925
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,410
Tom 3,424
chestnutmare 2,910
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,754
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 18
Tom 11
cathmg 5
Tina 3
John_C 3
Kaylin 1
Recent Posts
Dispensationalism
by Pilgrim. Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:13 AM
What exactly is a confessional church
by Pilgrim. Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:18 PM
James White Article
by Pilgrim. Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:10 PM
Importance of dating the destruction of the Temple
by Pilgrim. Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:13 PM
A study of the Heidelberg Catechism
by cathmg. Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 PM
"The Reformed View of Sanctification" - Sinclair Ferguson
by Pilgrim. Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:04 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: The Message [Re: Pilgrim] #9424
Fri Dec 26, 2003 3:15 PM
Fri Dec 26, 2003 3:15 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


Nice! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bananas.gif" alt="" />

Re: The Message [Re: Pilgrim] #9425
Fri Dec 26, 2003 3:31 PM
Fri Dec 26, 2003 3:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 281
Michigan, USA
MHeath Offline
Addict
MHeath  Offline
Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 281
Michigan, USA
you silly goose!! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />

Re: ESV [Re: Theo] #9426
Fri Dec 26, 2003 3:32 PM
Fri Dec 26, 2003 3:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 281
Michigan, USA
MHeath Offline
Addict
MHeath  Offline
Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 281
Michigan, USA
thanks for the link! will check this out..
Michele

Re: The Message #9427
Sun Dec 28, 2003 12:43 PM
Sun Dec 28, 2003 12:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 71
south fla.
Stucco Offline
Journeyman
Stucco  Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 71
south fla.
Quote
Kalled2Preach said:
Yeah. Paraphrases are not my big thing either.


I agree. But, on the other hand, isn't every translation a paraphrase to one degree or another?

Re: The Message [Re: Pilgrim] #9428
Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:21 PM
Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14
California
bishop3 Offline
Newbie
bishop3  Offline
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14
California
Pil!!

good one!!!! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/peace.gif" alt="" />

Re: The Message [Re: Stucco] #9429
Mon Dec 29, 2003 1:11 AM
Mon Dec 29, 2003 1:11 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


Hadn't really thought about it. lol

Re: The Message #9430
Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:09 PM
Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:09 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


I love the ESV also, but I also read New King James Version, New American Standard, and even Jay Green's Literal translation of the Bible. Interestingly, NKJV and Literal both use the Byzantine Greek text, whilst ESV and New American (along with many others) use the Majority text. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.

Re: The Message #9431
Sat Jan 03, 2004 9:59 AM
Sat Jan 03, 2004 9:59 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 351
The Great White North, Eh!
Henry Offline
Enthusiast
Henry  Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 351
The Great White North, Eh!
Here's an interesting page on The Message I found a while back: http://www.crossroad.to/Bible_studies/Message.html . Keep in mind it's written by fundamentalists, but they do have some good points.


(Latin phrase goes here.)
Re: The Message [Re: Henry] #9432
Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:40 PM
Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:40 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


I read some of that article, but I couldn't finish. It may have been the Holy Spirit, or it may not have. Anyway, what I noticed is that they didn't acknowledge that it is a paraphrase. It needs to be as accurate as possible, but what is the difference between paraphrasing and writing a commentary? Doesn't a commentary paraphrase and explain Scripture to the individuals interpretation? And doesn't Mr. Peterson do the same thing with The Message? Just some thoughts that came to mind. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />

Re: The Message #9433
Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:53 PM
Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
USA
J_Edwards Offline
Needs to get a Life
J_Edwards  Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
USA
I makes a huge difference when STUDYING the Scripture. One may read a commentary or a paraphrase and get some insight, but it IS NOT the same as (1) reading the Scriptures themselves (2) studying the Scriptures in-depth (which you cannot do from a paraphrase, because you do not have an "original" translation). NEVER allow a paraphrase to come between you and the Word of God (many are inaccurate). Never substitute a commentary for the Word of God. [Linked Image]


Reformed and Always Reforming,
Re: The Message #9434
Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:59 PM
Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:59 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,410
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,410
NH, USA
Personally, I think that a "Paraphrased Bible" sold with the intention of convincing the non-discerning buyer, that it as THE BIBLE in an "easy to read" format is both unethical, irresponsible and an oxymoron.

One of the main responsibilities of the Church is to "make disciples" of all nations, which is what Paul says Christ, through the Spirit, gifts men for in the Church. (cf. Eph 4:12-14). These people seem to think that if they can reduce the inspired written Word of God to a level where a first grader can comprehend the words, then people will have "more of a chance" to be saved and/or to learn truth. Give me a break!! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/igiveup.gif" alt="" />

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Re: The Message [Re: J_Edwards] #9435
Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:11 PM
Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:11 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


Dear Joe:

Quote
I makes a huge difference when STUDYING the Scripture. One may read a commentary or a paraphrase and get some insight, but it IS NOT the same as (1) reading the Scriptures themselves (2) studying the Scriptures in-depth (which you cannot do from a paraphrase, because you do not have an "original" translation). NEVER allow a paraphrase to come between you and the Word of God (many are inaccurate). Never substitute a commentary for the Word of God.

Amen

In Him,

Gerry

Re: The Message #9436
Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:17 PM
Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
USA
J_Edwards Offline
Needs to get a Life
J_Edwards  Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
USA
Do you see anything wrong here:

The text of the Message: 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 reads as follows:

Quote
Don't you realize that this is not the way to live? Unjust people who don't care about God will not be joining in his kingdom. Those who use and abuse each other, use and abuse sex, use and abuse the earth and everything in it, don't qualify as citizens in God's kingdom. <hr>
as compared to:<hr>

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
The text of the Message: 1 Timothy 1:9-10 reads as follows:

Quote
It's obvious, isn't it, that the law code isn't primarily for people who live responsibly, but for the irresponsible, who defy all authority, riding roughshod over God, life, sex, truth, whatever!" <hr>
as compared to:<hr>
Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;


Reformed and Always Reforming,
Re: The Message [Re: J_Edwards] #9437
Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:26 PM
Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:26 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A


Oh I would never substitute a paraphrase for Scripture. That'd be like substituting women for men preachers...you just shouldn't do that. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/nope.gif" alt="" />

Re: The Message [Re: bishop3] #9438
Sun Nov 27, 2005 8:16 PM
Sun Nov 27, 2005 8:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32
SC, USA
HCRigby Offline
Journeyman
HCRigby  Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32
SC, USA
Stucco asked: .... isn't every translation a paraphrase to one degree or another?
----
Hmmm........ I'm glad, for example, that Moses didn't paraphrase what God said His laws for the people were, but rather he translated them to the people.
Read the definition of the word translate and then that of paraphrase and the difference will be evident.
Not to be picking on Stucco, but I think that line of reasoning is a tool in Satan's hands every time someone chooses a paraphrase over the actual Word of God.

Cecil- who only looked at this thread because I was looking for an in-depth critique of The Message online and thought I'd find one here for sure......

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 108 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Dutch Michael, Ray, robertolang, SmallFry, drewk
925 Registered Users
Shout Box
April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
735,310 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.055s Queries: 16 (0.004s) Memory: 2.9656 MB (Peak: 3.2820 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-04-19 15:18:30 UTC