Go To Home Page
Messiah

Key: = Posted Today and Yesterday



'Theology Discussion Group'

Travel to the Highway home page and read our many fine articles and view the links to other sites by clicking on the blue The Highway logo in the upper right hand corner of this page.

« Forum Guidelines »

Total Messages Loaded: 590


Linda -:- Everett Harrison -:- Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 08:56:49 (PST)

Pilgrim -:- Article of the Month for March -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 21:02:51 (PST)
_
Rod -:- Re: Article of the Month for March -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 22:00:27 (PST)

monitor -:- Written Word and Doctrine -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 13:37:44 (PST)
_
Brother Bret -:- Preach On Monitor N/T :^ ) -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 19:47:25 (PST)

Rod -:- Rewarding search -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 11:48:01 (PST)

kevin -:- why do some messages disappear? -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 07:29:50 (PST)
_
monitor -:- Re: why do some messages disappear? -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:39:01 (PST)
__ kevin -:-
thank you -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 17:47:39 (PST)

Rod -:- Concerning the Holy Spirit of God -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 12:23:59 (PST)
_
Brother Bret -:- Re: Concerning the Holy Spirit of God -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 08:45:36 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Re: Concerning the Holy Spirit of God -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:06:31 (PST)

john hampshire -:- The substance of truth -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:05:30 (PST)
_
Rod -:- Re: The substance of truth -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 09:53:18 (PST)
_ E.V. -:-
GREAT post! n/t -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 09:04:06 (PST)
_ Pilgrim -:-
Re: The substance of truth -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 08:40:24 (PST)
__ Christopher -:-
Re: The substance of truth -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:00:27 (PST)
__ laz -:-
Even BETTER post...(n/t) -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 09:35:51 (PST)

john hampshire -:- Got truth? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:50:02 (PST)
_
clark -:- Re: Got truth? -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 07:21:04 (PST)
__ laz -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 14:05:42 (PST)
___ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Got truth?? -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 15:48:37 (PST)
____ clark -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:23:07 (PST)
_____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 07:44:42 (PST)
______ Rod -:-
Amen. n/t -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 08:03:03 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 06:17:28 (PST)
___ E.V. -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 15:38:38 (PST)
_ kevin -:-
a little simple -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 11:31:01 (PST)
_ Christopher -:-
:) -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 11:12:16 (PST)
_ Mike -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 10:26:31 (PST)
_ laz -:-
Re: Got truth? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 06:23:59 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
'For it is God...' -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 11:24:33 (PST)
___ Christopher -:-
Re: 'For it is God...' -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 12:21:32 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
Are we in agreement????? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 13:52:23 (PST)
_____ Christopher -:-
Re: Are we in agreement? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:05:38 (PST)
______ Rod -:-
As you can see, we're not in agreement. -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 16:53:01 (PST)
_______ Christopher -:-
Re: As you can see, we're not in agreement. -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 17:21:14 (PST)
________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: As you can see, we're not in agreement. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 02:41:18 (PST)
_________ Christopher -:-
Re: As you can see, we're not in agreement. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 09:16:35 (PST)
__________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: As you can see, we're not in agreement. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 15:32:21 (PST)
___________ Christopher -:-
Re: As you can see, we're not in agreement. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 15:54:59 (PST)
________ Rod -:-
I'm not a 'Protestant.' -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 20:07:48 (PST)
_________ Christopher -:-
Re: I'm not a 'Protestant.' -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 09:59:38 (PST)
__________ Rod -:-
Now this is meaningful. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:18:00 (PST)
___________ Christopher -:-
Re: Now this is meaningful. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:38:42 (PST)
____________ Tom -:-
A Clarifacation please -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 12:50:48 (PST)
_____________ Christopher -:-
Re: A Clarifacation please -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 14:27:10 (PST)
______________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: A Clarification please -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 16:00:32 (PST)
_______________ Christopher -:-
Re: A Clarification please -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 16:43:40 (PST)
________________ Pilgrim -:-
The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 20:53:20 (PST)
_________________ Christopher -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 19:41:00 (PST)
__________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 21:35:55 (PST)
___________________ Christopher -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 08:02:42 (PST)
____________________ Christopher -:-
Pilgrim, PS -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:16:36 (PST)
___________________ Tom -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 00:55:56 (PST)
____________________ Christopher -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:03:00 (PST)
_____________________ Rod -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:53:21 (PST)
______________________ Christopher -:-
monkery -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 14:41:16 (PST)
____________________ Rod -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 07:47:20 (PST)
____________________ kevin -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 07:26:42 (PST)
_____________________ a monitor -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:16:57 (PST)
_________________ Rod -:-
Re: The 'nitty gritty' of the matter! -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 21:19:18 (PST)
____________ Rod -:-
Not empty rhetoric. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:58:34 (PST)
_____________ Christopher -:-
Re: Not empty rhetoric. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 12:34:09 (PST)
______ laz -:-
Re: Are we in agreement? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:37:04 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
laz, you and I see it the same. -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 17:10:08 (PST)
_______ Christopher -:-
Re: Are we in agreement? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:50:23 (PST)
________ laz -:-
Re: Are we in agreement?? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 16:11:25 (PST)
_________ Christopher -:-
Re: Are we in agreement?? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 16:31:40 (PST)
______ Christopher -:-
Forgot one thing, Rod... -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:33:19 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
To imply that I've said otherwise is completely false, Christorpher. n/t -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 17:19:09 (PST)
________ Christopher -:-
Re: To imply that I've said otherwise is completely false, Christorpher. n/t -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 17:29:27 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
That would be a totally false interpretation of my point. -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 17:37:42 (PST)
__________ Christopher -:-
See? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 18:02:37 (PST)
___________ Rod -:-
You must understand something else. -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 20:27:12 (PST)
_______ laz -:-
Re: Forgot one thing, Rod... -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:39:21 (PST)
________ Christopher -:-
Re: Forgot one thing, Rod... -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:51:21 (PST)
_________ laz -:-
Re: Forgot one thing, Rod... -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 16:02:26 (PST)

Rod -:- Wesley & Whitefield musings -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 19:10:49 (PST)

Anne -:- Can we have an effect on God? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 07:26:15 (PST)
_
Gene -:- YES! -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 11:26:23 (PST)
_ Rod -:-
Re: Can we have an effect on God?? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 09:07:22 (PST)
__ kevin -:-
amen Rod -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 15:16:18 (PST)
___ Rod -:-
Amen, Kevin, and thank you. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 15:30:13 (PST)

laz -:- ShowUS ShowMe -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 19:34:52 (PST)
_
ShowMe -:- Re: ShowUS ShowMe -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 18:02:50 (PST)
__ laz -:-
Re: ShowUS ShowMe -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 21:53:27 (PST)
___ ShowMe -:-
Re: ShowUS ShowMe -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 08:20:45 (PST)
____ laz -:-
Re: ShowUS ShowMe -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 14:21:19 (PST)
____ Christopher -:-
ShowMe -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 13:47:38 (PST)
__ Pilgrim -:-
Re: ShowUS ShowMe -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 20:52:00 (PST)
___ ShowMe -:-
Argumentum ad Populum -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 08:23:44 (PST)
____ Tom -:-
Re: Argumentum ad Populum -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 12:12:22 (PST)
_____ ShowMe -:-
Re: Argumentum ad Populum -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 12:46:19 (PST)
______ lazarus -:-
Re: Argumentum ad Populum -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 14:59:26 (PST)
_______ Gene -:-
Re: Argumentum ad Populum -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 04:27:05 (PST)
________ laz -:-
Re: Argumentum ad Populum -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 13:50:16 (PST)
__ Prestor John -:-
Re: ShowUS ShowMe -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 20:45:42 (PST)

Rod -:- Are we who oppose Arminianism able -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 17:56:04 (PST)
_
Anne -:- Re: Are we who oppose Arminianism able -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 18:20:02 (PST)
__ Prestor John -:-
Re: Are we who oppose Arminianism able -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 19:12:37 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Re: Are we who oppose Arminianism able -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:01:34 (PST)
____ Prestor John -:-
Re: Are we who oppose Arminianism able -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 20:26:26 (PST)
___ Anne -:-
Tell me ALL about it . . . . -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 19:37:20 (PST)
____ Howard -:-
All -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 20:18:35 (PST)
_____ Anne -:-
What the heck would you do if I said 'Yes'? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:37:30 (PST)
______ kevin -:-
lengthy but i hope helpful -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 05:10:54 (PST)
_______ E.V. -:-
Why not affirm... -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 09:46:38 (PST)
________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: John 3:16 -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 13:43:29 (PST)
________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Why not affirm... -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 13:06:41 (PST)
_________ E.V. -:-
God's desires are more complex than you can understand -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 14:11:19 (PST)
__________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: God's desires are more complex than you can understand -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 15:14:43 (PST)
___________ Christopher -:-
A fair question -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 14:01:58 (PST)
___________ E.V. -:-
I expected better -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 13:11:47 (PST)
___________ Rod -:-
There is little appreciation for the whole counsel of God. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 15:51:51 (PST)
__________ Rod -:-
E.V., this is an ill-advised response. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 15:13:54 (PST)
___________ E.V. -:-
I apologize if offense was taken, but -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 13:17:20 (PST)
____________ Rod -:-
If you read the title of that post starkly, it seems very condescending. -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:57:16 (PST)
_____________ E.V. -:-
Re: If you read the title of that post starkly, it seems very condescending. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 05:21:42 (PST)
______________ Rod -:-
I have understood and do now understand your view. -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 09:07:07 (PST)
_______________ E.V. -:-
Okay, Rod -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 15:34:50 (PST)
____________ laz -:-
Re: I apologize if offense was taken, but -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:18:22 (PST)
_____________ E.V. -:-
Hey laz -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 05:06:21 (PST)
______________ Gene -:-
and the scripture is... -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:57:01 (PST)
_______________ E.V. -:-
Re: and the scripture is... -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 13:16:19 (PST)
______________ Prestor John -:-
Terms: Benevolence vs Love -:- Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 15:35:52 (PST)
_______________ E.V. -:-
Re: Terms: Benevolence vs Love -:- Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 08:34:13 (PST)
________ Rod -:-
Can't affirm what the Bible declares untrue. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 10:23:21 (PST)
_________ E.V. -:-
Might I suggest. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:18:41 (PST)
__________ Rod -:-
Thanks, E.V., but... -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:36:50 (PST)
___________ Gene -:-
Have you arrived? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 13:34:57 (PST)
____________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Have you arrived? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 13:53:20 (PST)
_____________ Gene -:-
Re: Have you arrived? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 19:16:04 (PST)
______________ laz -:-
Re: Have you arrived????? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 22:10:53 (PST)
_____________ Rod -:-
Precisely, brother, thank you. n/t -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 14:07:50 (PST)

Christopher -:- Universal Redemption -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:20:32 (PST)
_
Rod -:- May God raise up more stalwarts like Whitefield! -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:41:53 (PST)
__ Anne -:-
It gets better! -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 17:33:29 (PST)
__ Christopher -:-
Re: May God raise up more stalwarts like Whitefield! -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 13:05:58 (PST)
___ Pilgrim -:-
Re: May God raise up more stalwarts like Whitefield! -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 07:18:13 (PST)
____ Christopher -:-
Matt 23 -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:23:36 (PST)
___ Rod -:-
I think I've dealt with 2 Peter 3:9 almost weekly... -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 13:43:43 (PST)
____ Christopher -:-
Re: I think I've dealt with 2 Peter 3:9 almost weekly... -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 14:16:15 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
the nature of God's offer -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 15:34:37 (PST)
______ Christopher -:-
Re: the nature of God's offer -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 18:02:38 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
the nature of God's offer is bound up in mercy and grace -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 19:39:47 (PST)
________ Tom -:-
Re: the nature of God's offer is bound up in mercy and grace -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 00:54:22 (PST)
_________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: the nature of God's offer is bound up in mercy and grace -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 07:33:12 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
Re: the nature of God's offer is bound up in mercy and grace -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 01:36:47 (PST)
________ Christopher -:-
Re: the nature of God's offer is bound up in mercy and grace -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 21:22:58 (PST)
_________ Christopher -:-
Rom 9:22-24 -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 22:08:43 (PST)
__________ Rod -:-
there are so many grounds on which to object to this. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 00:14:29 (PST)
___________ Christopher -:-
Re: there are so many grounds on which to object to this. -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:29:38 (PST)
____________ Rod -:-
No discussion of the God of the Bible can legitimately... -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 09:24:01 (PST)
_____________ Christopher -:-
Re: No discussion of the God of the Bible can legitimately... -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 09:41:33 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
2 Peter 3 is crucial to the entire situation. -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 22:01:56 (PST)
__________ Christopher -:-
Re: 2 Peter 3 is crucial to the entire situation. -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 22:11:05 (PST)
___________ Rod -:-
The disagreement is that the text does say that. n/t -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 23:01:57 (PST)
____________ laz -:-
Re: The disagreement is that the text does say that. n/t -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:26:51 (PST)
_____________ Rod -:-
laz, was this directed to Christopher? n/t -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 10:16:53 (PST)
______________ laz -:-
you betcha (n/t) -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 21:54:31 (PST)
_______________ Christopher -:-
Clarification? -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 23:32:20 (PST)
________________ laz -:-
Re: Clarification? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 06:27:13 (PST)
_________________ Christopher -:-
Re: Clarification? -:- Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 10:57:01 (PST)

Starr Stevens -:- Openess of God theology -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 20:53:31 (PST)
_
Rod -:- Re: Openess of God theology -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:10:31 (PST)
_ mebaser -:-
Re: Openess of God theology -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 23:54:47 (PST)
__ laz -:-
Re: Openess of God theology -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 07:02:30 (PST)
___ mebaser -:-
Re: Openess of God theology -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 18:38:06 (PST)
___ kevin -:-
short definition -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:53:11 (PST)
____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: short definition -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 13:55:46 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
short summary: It's blasphemy! n/t -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 11:57:19 (PST)
___ John -:-
Re: Openess of God theology -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 09:39:27 (PST)
____ laz -:-
Re: Openess of God theology -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:02:02 (PST)

Rod -:- Questions for Kevin -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 06:35:41 (PST)
_
kevin -:- answers for rod -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 15:16:29 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Thanks for answering. -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 16:31:25 (PST)
___ Rod -:-
Response continued -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 17:44:58 (PST)
____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Response continued -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 20:00:57 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
Thank you, Pilgrim, and these are excellent points. -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 20:59:27 (PST)
______ kevin -:-
Re: Thank you, Pilgrim, and these are excellent points. -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 04:05:24 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
The Atonement -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:46:14 (PST)
________ kevin -:-
Re: The Atonement -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:37:02 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
I hope we are in essential agreement! -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 13:00:26 (PST)
__________ kevin -:-
Re: I hope we are in essential agreement! -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:46:27 (PST)

laz -:- Enoch NOT from Cain -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 18:43:58 (PST)

Rod -:- Defying the written Word and logic -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:12:49 (PST)

Joel H -:- Please show me! Showme! -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:06:04 (PST)

kevin -:- James 5:13-18 -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 19:58:32 (PST)
_
stan -:- Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 20:40:12 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
amen! n/t -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 05:30:49 (PST)
_ laz -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 08:17:42 (PST)
__ kevin -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 19:04:49 (PST)
_ Tom -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 01:16:12 (PST)
__ kevin -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 05:42:07 (PST)
___ john hampshire -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 22:10:10 (PST)
____ a monitor -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:01:23 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
a monitor: exactly! Thanks. n/t -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:35:36 (PST)
____ kevin -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 05:04:54 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: James 5:13-18 -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 07:30:23 (PST)
______ Rod -:-
'if' -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 09:09:54 (PST)
_______ Tom -:-
A thought occured to me -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 01:00:59 (PST)
________ Rod -:-
You are correct, brother Tom. -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:59:07 (PST)
_________ kevin -:-
small point on gifts -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:46:55 (PST)
__________ Rod -:-
a couple of other significant points -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 13:13:32 (PST)
__________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: small point on gifts -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:23:41 (PST)
___________ kevin -:-
thank you -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:43:29 (PST)
____________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: thank you -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 07:57:37 (PST)
_____________ kevin -:-
Re: thank you -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 14:57:58 (PST)
______________ kevin -:-
post by kevin titled Re: thank you for Rod and Pilgrim -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 15:21:41 (PST)
________ kevin -:-
Re: A thought occured to me -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 03:47:46 (PST)
_______ laz -:-
Re: 'if' -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 11:00:58 (PST)
________ Rod -:-
Re: 'if' -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 11:35:02 (PST)
_________ laz -:-
Re: 'if' -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 14:26:02 (PST)

E.V. -:- Calvinist's view of sanctification -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 18:11:15 (PST)
_
Prestor John -:- Re: Calvinist's view of sanctification -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 22:21:41 (PST)
__ E.V. -:-
Re: Calvinist's view of sanctification -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 08:05:59 (PST)
___ Prestor John -:-
Re: Calvinist's view of sanctification -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 22:08:09 (PST)
___ Hesed -:-
SYNERGY YES... -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 16:54:40 (PST)
____ E.V. -:-
Further questions -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 10:53:55 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: Further questions -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 11:20:32 (PST)
______ kevin -:-
amen and amen -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:15:44 (PST)
______ E.V. -:-
Okay laz, -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 15:51:01 (PST)
___ Tom -:-
Re: Calvinist's view of sanctification -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 14:34:48 (PST)

Rod -:- Okay, 'Show Me' -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 11:53:34 (PST)

ShowMe -:- Sin Withoug Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 08:53:37 (PST)
_
Pilgrim -:- Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 21:53:04 (PST)
__ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:22:40 (PST)
___ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 13:14:04 (PST)
____ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 17:09:29 (PST)
_____ Tom -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 01:08:03 (PST)
______ ShowMe -:-
You Must Be Born Again -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 05:53:19 (PST)
_______ Tom -:-
Re: You Must Be Born Again -:- Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 01:24:05 (PST)
_______ Pilgrim -:-
Re: You Must Be Born Again -:- Thurs, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:12:51 (PST)
______ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 12:29:17 (PST)
______ laz -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 07:49:05 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 19:02:33 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
I hope everyone here sees this post of yours. -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 15:19:08 (PST)
_ Tom -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 13:14:07 (PST)
__ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 16:06:35 (PST)
___ Tom -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 01:09:39 (PST)
_ laz -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:52:37 (PST)
__ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 11:31:36 (PST)
___ Five sola -:-
no tempter? -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:55:30 (PST)
____ Gene -:-
Re: no tempter? -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 14:35:49 (PST)
_____ Five Sola -:-
your point? -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 21:42:04 (PST)
______ Gene -:-
Re: your point? -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:02:25 (PST)
_______ Five Sola -:-
oh ok! -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 18:43:51 (PST)
___ laz -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:19:32 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
Cain, Cainan, and Kenan -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 13:12:49 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: Cain, Cainan, and Kenan -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 13:23:28 (PST)
______ ShowMe -:-
Re: Cain, Cainan, and Kenan -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 16:09:16 (PST)
_______ Tom -:-
Re: Cain, Cainan, and Kenan -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 00:45:30 (PST)
__ Gene -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 11:16:19 (PST)
___ Five Sola -:-
works salvation? -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 13:00:27 (PST)
___ laz -:-
Re: Sin Without Free Will? Continued -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:21:39 (PST)
____ Gene -:-
Psalm 22:6 -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 14:18:15 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: Psalm 22:6 -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 14:59:11 (PST)
______ Gene -:-
Re: Psalm 22:6 -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 15:17:54 (PST)
_______ laz -:-
Re: Psalm 22:6 -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 15:32:46 (PST)
________ Gene -:-
Re: Psalm 22:6 -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:12:53 (PST)
____ ShowMe -:-
Sinless Mary -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 13:09:17 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
Unwarrented assumptions -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 15:02:33 (PST)
______ clark -:-
Re: Unwarrented assumptions -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:58:42 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
Re: Unwarrented assumptions -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 11:25:37 (PST)
_______ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Unwarrented assumptions -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 07:37:26 (PST)
______ ShowMe -:-
Re: Unwarrented assumptions -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 16:13:15 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
Another unwarranted assumption -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:43:23 (PST)
________ Gene -:-
John 1:14...again! -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 14:11:14 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
Wrong assumption...again! -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 15:43:54 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
Re: Unwarrented assumptions -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 02:50:54 (PST)
___ Rod -:-
Context, context, context -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 11:35:38 (PST)
____ Gene -:-
Re: Context, context, context -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 14:29:09 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
Re: Context, context, context -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 15:25:04 (PST)
_ Rod -:-
For 'Don't Show Me' -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:16:01 (PST)
__ ShowMe -:-
Re: For 'Don't Show Me' -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:47:50 (PST)
___ Hesed -:-
Dear Senior 'Show Me' -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 15:35:24 (PST)
____ laz -:-
Dear Senior 'Show Me' -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 15:46:59 (PST)
_____ ShowMe -:-
Re: Dear Senior 'Show Me' -:- Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 16:31:18 (PST)
______ Gene -:-
Re: Dear Senior 'Show Me' -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:08:35 (PST)
_______ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Dear Senior 'Show Me' -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 07:46:00 (PST)
________ Gene -:-
Re: Dear Senior 'Show Me' -:- Tues, Feb 22, 2000 at 14:07:29 (PST)

Pilgrim -:- The Highway UPDATE! -:- Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 10:15:18 (PST)

stan -:- FYI -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 15:08:47 (PST)
_
kevin -:- extra info -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 19:07:02 (PST)

Rod -:- clarification -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 16:48:52 (PST)
_
mebaser -:- Re: clarification -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 08:18:14 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Concerning the 'false accusation.' -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:42:40 (PST)
___ mebaser -:-
Thanks -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 18:50:56 (PST)
_ Gene -:-
How do you know? -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 18:48:33 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Christians believe, first and foremost -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 19:41:10 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Re: Christians believe, first and foremost -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 02:47:19 (PST)
____ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Christians believe, first and foremost -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 14:44:23 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
Gene, this is a perfect example of your inability to see... -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:31:11 (PST)
____ mebaser -:-
Re: Christians believe, first and foremost -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 08:01:24 (PST)

Rod -:- Unity, when there is none. -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 11:21:04 (PST)
_
Christopher -:- Re: Unity, when there is none. -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 15:04:40 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Thanks, Christopher. n/t -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 15:08:10 (PST)
___ hESED -:-
Re: Apostolic succession -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 20:48:03 (PST)
____ Prestor John -:-
Re: Apostolic succession -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 21:48:06 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
Re: Apostolic succession -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 22:21:17 (PST)
______ Hesed -:-
Re:Holy Spirit & successors -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 23:33:01 (PST)
_______ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Re:Holy Spirit & successors -:- Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 12:33:47 (PST)
________ Hesed -:-
Re: Re:Holy Spirit & successors -:- Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 20:59:32 (PST)
______ laz -:-
Re: Apostolic succession -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 11:06:30 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
laz, AMEN! n/t -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 12:28:25 (PST)
______ Christopher -:-
Re: Apostolic succession -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:17:58 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
Christopher, my thoughts on this are pretty simple and direct. -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:03:57 (PST)
________ Christopher -:-
Re: Christopher, my thoughts on this are pretty simple and direct. -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 11:01:31 (PST)

Kent W -:- Justification -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 09:06:17 (PST)

Gene -:- Pharaoh's heart -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 03:44:25 (PST)
_
Pilgrim -:- Re: Pharaoh's heart -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 13:03:53 (PST)
__ Gene -:-
Re: Pharaoh's heart -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 14:02:23 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
The actual question asked... -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 13:43:40 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Re: The actual question asked... -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 13:55:17 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
Gene, I wonder what you'd have said to Pilgrim, -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 14:23:01 (PST)
_____ Gene -:-
Re: Gene, I wonder what you'd have said to Pilgrim, -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 14:46:25 (PST)
______ Rod -:-
Gene, here's a better question. -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 15:03:44 (PST)
_______ mebaser -:-
Re: Gene, here's a better question. -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 16:02:29 (PST)
________ Rod -:-
What unfair accusation would that be? n/t -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 16:11:28 (PST)

Tom -:- Gene -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 13:31:13 (PST)
_
Five Sola -:- Re: Gene -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 19:25:23 (PST)
__ Tom -:-
Re: Gene -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 11:58:42 (PST)
__ Gene -:-
Re: Gene -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 04:48:13 (PST)
_ Gene -:-
Re: Gene -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 14:09:44 (PST)
__ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Gene -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 15:25:06 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Re: Gene -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 18:58:39 (PST)
____ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Gene -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 15:37:22 (PST)

george -:- 'Wicket Gate' -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 16:50:51 (PST)

Rod -:- An explanation of my return -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 10:49:54 (PST)
_
Anne -:- Glad you're back, Rod!!! We missed you. EOM -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:12:39 (PST)
_ Pilgrim -:-
Re: An explanation of my return -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:09:49 (PST)__ Rod -:- Re: An explanation of my return -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:15:18 (PST)
___ David Teh -:-
Re: An explanation of my return -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 08:09:10 (PST)

danny -:- leviticus -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 12:50:43 (PST)
_
Anne -:- Re: leviticus -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 17:30:55 (PST)
_ Rod -:-
A few considerations -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 10:23:45 (PST)
__ Anne -:-
Re: A few considerations -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:32:40 (PST)
___ Rod -:-
Re: A few considerations -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:06:41 (PST)
_ Gene -:-
Re: leviticus -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 04:00:36 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Re: leviticus -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:08:01 (PST)
___ mebaser -:-
Whoah! wait a minute -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 15:10:44 (PST)
____ laz -:-
Re: Whoah! wait a minute -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 20:19:47 (PST)
_____ mebaser -:-
Amen -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 00:16:37 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
mebaser, have you really read the thread??? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 16:02:11 (PST)
_____ Gene -:-
It is so nice... -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 04:54:16 (PST)
______ Rod -:-
Gene, I'm pretty sure that several share your sentiments -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:28:40 (PST)
_______ Gene -:-
Re: Gene, I'm pretty sure that several share your sentiments -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 07:55:18 (PST)
________ monitor -:-
Re: Gene, I'm pretty sure that several share your sentiments -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 21:12:22 (PST)
_____ mebaser -:-
Did you read MY post?? -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 00:24:09 (PST)
______ Rod -:-
Why, yes, I read and understood your point -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 01:58:54 (PST)
_______ mebaser -:-
Answering for Gene -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 18:11:33 (PST)
_______ Gene -:-
Re: Why, yes, I read and understood your point -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 04:50:58 (PST)
________ Rod -:-
Gene, I'm very pleased to hear that! -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:20:34 (PST)
_________ Gene -:-
Re: Gene, I'm very pleased to hear that! -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 07:50:45 (PST)
__________ Rod -:-
Gene, that doesn't answer either question, but -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 08:50:40 (PST)
___________ Gene -:-
Re: Gene, that doesn't answer either question, but -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 11:01:27 (PST)
____________ Rod -:-
What does it have to do with God and culture?? -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 11:47:27 (PST)
__ laz -:-
Re: leviticus -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:51:26 (PST)
___ mebaser -:-
C'mon Laz -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 15:34:46 (PST)

ShowMe -:- Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:21:21 (PST)
_
Hesed -:- Both are true! -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 13:03:11 (PST)
_ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 21:48:54 (PST)
__ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:09:12 (PST)
___ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 13:07:48 (PST)
____ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 16:44:22 (PST)
_____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 17:47:28 (PST)
______ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 13:05:29 (PST)
_______ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 13:38:31 (PST)
________ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 17:03:26 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
It seems you should change your handle to... -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 19:44:07 (PST)
__________ ShowMe -:-
Sin without free will??? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 21:07:43 (PST)
___________ Rod -:-
That's some of the most 'creative' exegesis I've ever heard! -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 22:40:59 (PST)
____________ ShowMe -:-
Sin without free will????? -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 08:46:53 (PST)
_____________ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will????? -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 13:19:19 (PST)
______________ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will????? -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 15:04:02 (PST)
_______________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin without free will????? -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 18:00:49 (PST)
________________ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will????? -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 01:08:06 (PST)
_________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin without free will????? -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 17:36:19 (PST)
__________________ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will????? -:- Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 00:36:42 (PST)
__________________ na -:-
Hey, brothers,... -:- Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 18:50:21 (PST)
_ Diaconeo -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 10:43:17 (PST)
__ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 13:05:20 (PST)
___ Diaconeo -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:22:16 (PST)
____ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 13:15:03 (PST)
_____ Diaconeo -:-
Apology accepted (nt) -:- Thurs, Feb 17, 2000 at 12:27:56 (PST)
__ AHMNOTEAR -:-
Sin is from a will 'free from righteousness.' -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 14:58:20 (PST)
___ Diaconeo -:-
Re: Sin is from a will 'free from righteousness.' -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 12:33:36 (PST)
___ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin is from a will 'free from righteousness.' -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 19:42:33 (PST)
____ Tom -:-
Re: Sin is from a will 'free from righteousness.' -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 13:53:45 (PST)
_____ Scott -:-
Re: Sin is from a will 'free from righteousness.' -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 22:25:39 (PST)
___ a monitor -:-
Re: Sin is from a will 'free from righteousness.' -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 17:03:43 (PST)
____ AHMNOTEAR -:-
Thank you sincerely, monitor -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 18:29:59 (PST)
__ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 11:43:08 (PST)
___ Scott -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 22:29:04 (PST)
___ laz -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 16:52:35 (PST)
____ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 19:46:27 (PST)
_____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 13:17:52 (PST)
_____ laz -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 07:26:33 (PST)
______ ShowMe -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:15:56 (PST)
_______ Tom -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 14:04:25 (PST)
_____ Hesed -:-
Re: Sin without free will? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 20:01:40 (PST)
____ Anne -:-
Re: Sin without free will??? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 18:21:50 (PST)
_____ AHMNOTEAR -:-
But... -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 18:40:37 (PST)

scott lewis -:- Answers for PILGRIM -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 20:43:41 (PST)

john hampshire -:- Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 22:38:42 (PST)
_
Gene -:- Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 05:37:55 (PST)
__ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 13:16:43 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 17:16:40 (PST)
____ john hampshire -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 19:19:36 (PST)
_____ Gene -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 03:22:55 (PST)
_____ Five Sola -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 20:11:43 (PST)
______ john hampshire -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 01:35:17 (PST)
_______ Five Sola -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 18:48:27 (PST)
_______ Tom -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:48:20 (PST)
________ john hampshire -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 01:33:35 (PST)
_________ Tom -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 00:40:03 (PST)
__________ john hampshire -:-
[ no ] nt -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 05:07:18 (PST)
___________ Tom -:-
Re: [ no ] nt -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 13:49:22 (PST)
____________ john hampshire -:-
PhD vs hot O2 -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 05:40:08 (PST)
_____________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: PhD vs hot O2 -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 08:36:27 (PST)
______________ mebaser -:-
I must agree -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 23:07:45 (PST)
___________ laz -:-
Re: [ no ] nt -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:21:26 (PST)
_ mebaser -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 01:56:12 (PST)
__ john hampshire -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 17:32:01 (PST)
___ mebaser -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 23:56:38 (PST)
____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 11:47:28 (PST)
____ john hampshire -:-
Re: Scripture agrees, why can't we? -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 02:49:25 (PST)

Pilgrim -:- My Questions to Dispies! :-) -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 12:01:39 (PST)
_
dispie light -:- Re: And yet more flack!!!!!!!!! ;-) -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 17:05:46 (PST)
__ Pilgrim -:-
Re: And yet more flack!!!!!!!!! ;-) -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 19:18:11 (PST)
___ stan -:-
Re: ;-) -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 19:48:30 (PST)

LetsObeyChrist Lk.6:46 Mt -:- Only the Jews had God's permission -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 04:13:25 (PST)
_
Christopher -:- Re: Only the Jews had God's permission -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 10:06:26 (PST)
__ Christopher -:-
Pilgrim, little help? nt -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 17:18:30 (PST)
_ mebaser -:-
deuterocanonical books -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 00:42:09 (PST)

Tom -:- Sin -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 13:13:12 (PST)
_
Brother Bret -:- Re: Sin -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 19:11:54 (PST)

jh -:- Born Again is the only condition -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 13:01:41 (PST)
_
scott lewis -:- apology's -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 12:01:47 (PST)
__ jh -:-
Re: apology's -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 13:06:33 (PST)

Christopher -:- BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:57:32 (PST)
_
Five Sola -:- some articles -:- Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 20:32:58 (PST)
__ Christopher -:-
Re: some articles -:- Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 08:42:26 (PST)
_ Pilgrim -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:37:27 (PST)
__ Christopher -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 13:20:03 (PST)
___ Pilgrim -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 18:50:45 (PST)
____ Tom -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 00:54:55 (PST)
____ Christopher -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 20:10:04 (PST)
_____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 11:44:44 (PST)
______ Christopher -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 12:28:44 (PST)
____ Brother Bret -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 19:21:13 (PST)
_____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: BB/Pilgrim, on baptism -:- Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 11:54:38 (PST)

knowfear -:- forgiveness for the believer? -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 09:23:28 (PST)
_
Anne -:- Re: forgiveness for the believer? -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:06:01 (PST)
__ knowfear -:-
Re: forgiveness for the believer? -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:34:05 (PST)

Brother Bret -:- Latest Post In 'Timing of Rapture ' -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 20:29:07 (PST)
_
knowfear -:- Re: Latest Post In 'Timing of Rapture ' -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 09:43:50 (PST)
__ Tom -:-
Re: Latest Post In 'Timing of Rapture ' -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 13:29:29 (PST)
_ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Latest Post In 'Timing of Rapture ' -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 21:46:42 (PST)
__ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Latest Post In 'Timing of Rapture ' -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 18:42:09 (PST)
__ Vic Eagle -:-
Let's avoid group think -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 15:59:21 (PST)
___ john hampshire -:-
Re: Let's avoid group think -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 21:57:27 (PST)
____ Vic Eagle -:-
If you miss the Ratpure -:- Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 15:53:42 (PST)
_____ lurkerjr -:-
Re: If you miss the Ratpure -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:44:40 (PST)
______ mebaser -:-
Re: If you miss the Ratpure -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 14:45:22 (PST)
_______ lj -:-
Re: If you miss the Ratpure -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 20:57:32 (PST)
________ mebaser -:-
Re: If you miss the Ratpure -:- Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 00:12:28 (PST)
______ Vic Eagle -:-
I'm not sure what you mean -:- Tues, Feb 15, 2000 at 13:03:35 (PST)

CyberFish -:- Logic -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:25:54 (PST)
_
Joel H -:- Re:Logic -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 13:18:05 (PST)

Simone -:- Husband -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 09:07:50 (PST)
_
john hampshire -:- Re: Husband -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 04:19:06 (PST)
_ E.V. -:-
Re: Husband -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 17:51:57 (PST)
_ george -:-
Re: Husband -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 16:26:45 (PST)
__ Simone -:-
Re: Husband -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 14:07:03 (PST)

Anne -:- News of Personal Portent! -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 08:24:08 (PST)
_
laz -:- Re: News of Personal Portent! -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 19:38:53 (PST)
_ george -:-
Congratulation Anne and Daughter,NT -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 19:10:21 (PST)
_ Theo -:-
Re: News of Personal Portent! -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 11:46:24 (PST)

Vernon -:- Wife -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 07:01:05 (PST)
_
stan -:- Re: Amen! great to hear nt -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 08:53:34 (PST)
_ Anne -:-
Re: Wife -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 08:16:33 (PST)
_ clark -:-
Re: Wife -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 08:07:44 (PST)
__ Vern -:-
Re: Wife -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 17:17:47 (PST)
___ clark -:-
Re: Wife -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 05:45:25 (PST)
____ Vernon -:-
Re: Wife -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 06:50:05 (PST)

Pilgrim -:- Reformed Confessions Update -:- Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 20:14:44 (PST)

john hampshire -:- Pre-trib rapture won't fly -:- Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 19:28:42 (PST)
_
Vic Eagle -:- The Rapture will levitate cooler than David Blaine -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 15:34:58 (PST)
__ jh -:-
Re: The Rapture will levitate cooler than David Blaine -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 15:53:14 (PST)
___ Vic Eagle -:-
I said Revelation 7:9 ff. -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 16:10:01 (PST)
_ stan -:-
Re: Seems to fly well considering all the flack you send up :-) NT -:- Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 19:27:57 (PST)
__ jh -:-
It doesn't say on earth... -:- Tues, Feb 08, 2000 at 12:57:23 (PST)
___ scott lewis -:-
Re: It doesn't say on earth... -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:01:02 (PST)
____ jh -:-
Re: It doesn't say on earth... -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:29:29 (PST)
_____ Pilgrim -:-
Re: It doesn't say on earth... -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 19:53:54 (PST)
___ john hampshire -:-
I agree again (it's uncanny!) [nt] -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 00:07:08 (PST)

laz -:- Sin Coming from Heart -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 21:15:40 (PST)
_
Gene -:- Re: Sin Coming from Heart -:- Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 03:04:22 (PST)

Christopher -:- From SLewis' post -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 19:29:21 (PST)
_
Pilgrim -:- Re: From SLewis' post -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 23:43:07 (PST)
__ Christopher -:-
Found it, thanks much. NT -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 07:47:35 (PST)

Brother Bret -:- Timing of the Rapture -:- Tues, Feb 01, 2000 at 16:28:49 (PST)
_
Ian Achrist -:- Re: Timing of the Rapture -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 20:53:06 (PST)
__ scott lewis -:-
Re: Timing of the Rapture -:- Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 23:19:37 (PST)
_ Prestor John -:-
Re: Timing of the Rapture -:- Tues, Feb 01, 2000 at 20:02:30 (PST)
__ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Timing of the Rapture -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 22:32:28 (PST)
__ scott lewis -:-
Fires :) -:- Tues, Feb 01, 2000 at 21:26:18 (PST)
___ Prestor John -:-
Re: Fires :) -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 18:17:26 (PST)
____ scott lewis -:-
Here you go John -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 09:35:55 (PST)
_____ Prestor John -:-
Re: Here you go John -:- Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 20:58:52 (PST)
______ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Here you go John -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 15:11:16 (PST)
______ john hampshire -:-
Cannot understand your reasoning -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 03:32:08 (PST)
_______ Vic Eagle -:-
Cake vs. Spaghetti -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 14:01:21 (PST)
_______ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Cannot understand your reasoning -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:36:38 (PST)
________ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Cannot understand your reasoning -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 20:26:18 (PST)
________ scott -:-
Re: Cannot understand your reasoning -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:49:35 (PST)
_________ Pilgrim -:-
My own questions to the Dispies! :~) -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 19:34:07 (PST)
_________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Cannot understand your reasoning -:- Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:17:47 (PST)
______ scott lewis -:-
Acts 10 -:- Tues, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:15:27 (PST)
_______ Prestor John -:-
Re: Acts 10 -:- Tues, Feb 08, 2000 at 14:06:04 (PST)
________ scott lewis -:-
Re: Acts 10 -:- Tues, Feb 08, 2000 at 20:56:47 (PST)
_________ mebaser -:-
Re: Acts 10 -:- Tues, Feb 08, 2000 at 22:41:30 (PST)
___ john hampshire -:-
Napalm in the morning folks -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 04:04:30 (PST)
____ scott lewis -:-
Re: Napalm in the morning folks -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 22:07:37 (PST)
_____ john hampshire -:-
Re: Napalm in the morning folks -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:31:32 (PST)
______ Vic Eagle -:-
Let's have our Rapture cake and eat it, too -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 15:15:23 (PST)
_______ jh -:-
There is only one rapture -:- Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 13:20:36 (PST)
________ Vic Eagle -:-
They were nevertheless _r_aptured -:- Thurs, Feb 10, 2000 at 13:13:13 (PST)
______ scott lewis -:-
Re: Napalm in the morning folks -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 08:21:13 (PST)
_______ Brother Bret -:-
Re: Napalm in the morning folks -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 21:32:11 (PST)

Rod -:- The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 15:07:13 (PST)
_
lindell -:- yes it has -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 14:09:42 (PST)
_ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 08:58:39 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 13:46:21 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Brings up another question -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 19:22:26 (PST)
__ Gene -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:39:11 (PST)
___ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 19:07:30 (PST)
_ Gene -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 18:20:32 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 19:32:08 (PST)
___ Gene -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 20:25:33 (PST)
____ mebaser -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 12:17:14 (PST)
_____ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 14:37:54 (PST)
______ mebaser -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 17:12:43 (PST)
_______ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 19:36:09 (PST)
________ Prestor John -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 15:21:44 (PST)
________ mebaser -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 02:08:52 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 11:36:40 (PST)
________ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 19:52:24 (PST)
_________ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 20:32:40 (PST)
__________ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 21:25:34 (PST)
___________ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 22:45:18 (PST)
____________ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 14:49:33 (PST)
_____________ Tom -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Tues, Feb 01, 2000 at 01:59:02 (PST)
_____________ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 18:03:15 (PST)
______________ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 20:00:54 (PST)
_______________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 09:08:34 (PST)
________________ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 12:29:57 (PST)
_________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 19:01:46 (PST)
__________________ lindell -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 20:25:37 (PST)
___________________ laz -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 10:54:24 (PST)
___________________ scott lewis -:-
Peccability/Impeccability -:- Tues, Feb 01, 2000 at 21:50:36 (PST)
____________________ Tom -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 00:33:50 (PST)
_____________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 07:44:09 (PST)
______________________ Gene -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:43:20 (PST)
_______________________ mebaser -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 06:44:24 (PST)
________________________ Gene -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:51:28 (PST)
_________________________ mebaser -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 15:19:15 (PST)
______________________ scott lewis -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 21:20:52 (PST)
_______________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 21:55:36 (PST)
________________________ scott lewis -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 22:14:36 (PST)
_________________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 00:03:58 (PST)
__________________________ facetious LurkerJR -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:06:15 (PST)
__________________________ scott lewis -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 08:27:57 (PST)
___________________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 13:37:26 (PST)
___________________________ laz -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:17:49 (PST)
____________________________ Gene -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:59:10 (PST)
_____________________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 13:45:19 (PST)
_____________________________ laz -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 13:43:42 (PST)
______________________________ Gene -:-
Re: Peccability/Impeccability -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 15:16:34 (PST)
_______________________________ laz -:-
Get Real, Gene -:- Thurs, Feb 03, 2000 at 21:06:32 (PST)
________________________________ Gene -:-
Just being honest -:- Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:57:24 (PST)
_________________________________ laz -:-
Re: Just being honest -:- Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:19:04 (PST)
___________________ Pilgrim -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 22:02:52 (PST)
_______________ Rod -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 20:41:51 (PST)
____ Rod -:-
You didn't 'miss the chapter and verse' you just deny God's truth. n/t -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 20:38:38 (PST)
_____ Gene -:-
Good answer! -:- Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 04:09:24 (PST)
_ Anne -:-
Re: The Perfection of the Lord Jesus -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 18:09:30 (PST)
__ Rod -:-
Anne--'I'll get right on that!' -:- Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 18:27:32 (PST)



Powerforum Plus+
Paradise Web Enhancements
Copyright 1997,1998



Subject: Everett Harrison
From: Linda
To: All
Date Posted: Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 08:56:49 (PST)
Email Address: Not Provided

Message:
I'm hoping someone might have access to articles by Everett Harrison. He wrote the Romans Commentary in the Expositor's Commentary, helped start Fuller Seminary, was a prolific writer and well known theologian of the 20th century. I have just never seen anything posted here about him. I am particularly interested finding something by him on salvation or election. He died last year in his nineties. Blessings, Linda Linda


Subject: Article of the Month for March
From: Pilgrim
To: All
Date Posted: Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 21:02:51 (PST)
Email Address: Not Provided

Message:

With the recent discussions involving 'ShowMe' and those who are want to acknowledge the biblical doctrine of Original Sin and Total Depravity, the 'Article of the Month' for March will be of great interest to most. In addition, the even more recent topic of the Holy Spirit makes it even more apropos. This month features a chapter from the beloved Iain Murray's latest book, Pentecost Today? by Banner of Truth Trust. You can surf over to the article by clicking here: Charles G. Finney: How Theology Affects Understanding of Revival May the Lord God bless this article to your hearts and enrich your minds; being filled with the knowledge of God.

In His Precious Blood, Pilgrim


Subject: Re: Article of the Month for March
From: Rod
To: Pilgrim
Date Posted: Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 22:00:27 (PST)
Email Address: na

Message:
Pilgrim, Both an excellent article and most appropriate to our study.


Subject: Written Word and Doctrine
From: monitor
To: All
Date Posted: Tues, Feb 29, 2000 at 13:37:44 (PST)
Email Address: Not Provided

Message:
This is a repeat...sorry. I feel that this debate over what is authoritative is getting too complicated. The scriptures clearly indicate that we are not to go beyond what is written.
1Co 4:6 And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another. There is no biblical warrant to believe that tradition supercedes or is even at par with God's Word. That would be pure presumption. The written Word will infallibly reach the Elect and they WILL understand by His Spirit working in concert with that good Word thru God's ordained means...to include godly pastors, teachers, creeds, confessions, sacraments, etc... We need to consider the Word above men and the works or men, even godly men....to include any doctrines or traditions. The written word is how God has always established and maintained His preceptive will for us. Jesus Christ quoted and fullfilled scripture (written Word) to make His point. Traditions of men consistently took 'hits'. On the road to Emmaeus, the resurrected Christ opened up the SCRIPTURES. Do we have any indication in all of redemptive history where 'traditions' hold equal weight with God's very Words? Now that we have the written Word...what of doctrine? Here is an analogy which may easily break up. Clark might like this one. haha The written word is like pure science and doctrine is like engineering. One comes first...for you can't do real engineering without a firm grasp of the sciences...as engineering is merely the application of science. Engineering is the servant of science....doctrine is the servant of the Word. And we find the NT replete with the term 'doctrine' and it's indespensible plac