I found a 2009 discussion between a Postmillennial (Doug Wilson), a Historic Premillenialism (Jim Hamilton) and Amillennialism (Sam Storms); with John Piper as the moderator.
https://youtu.be/W75bzrvJtLs
The discussion is over 2 hours long. So, I would actually like to forward it until about ½ way. Sam Storm says something that actually made things heat up.
1:15:22 Storms “if Rev 20 teaches a pre-millennial view as you (Hamilton) articulated, I’d have to abandon biblical inerrancy”...
As I think about Revelation chapter 20, it seems that in most discussions on eschatology press on. Especially Historical Premils against Amils.
I was wondering if I could get a few opinions of this spirited discussion between Hamilton and Storms.
By the way, if it is possible please try and forget who these people are. Rather, think about how they represent their various positions. Even though I consider myself Amil; I have a few problems with all four people in certain areas.
Tom