I've always put myself in the Lordship Salvation camp, but are there different forms of it?

I thought the argument was over whether someone can become a believer without submitting to Christ Jesus as Lord. Those arguiing against LS are saying that someone can become a believer without acknowleging Christ as Lord, just their Savior.

If LS is the proper way of understanding, why do some get jittery in thinking LS advocates a works rigtheousness path of salvation.

Are their LS proponenents taking it to far, or is my understanding of it faulty?

Wasn't the term more or less coin during the debate several years ago between MacArthur and Swindle with easy believism being at stake?

John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7