Did you even bother to read the statement I linked you to? John explains why he believed what he did.

Quote
John denied that the the Second Person of the Trinity was the Son in eternity. What does this mean? Does it merely mean that the Son wasn't yet incarnated?

(Fred) It simply means that Christ had not yet taken on the title of son in his humanity. It was in eternity past, something decreed to happen with the second person of the Trinity.
Keep in mind that I am agreeing with your general flow of thought; my debate is with your misrepresenting what John believed and taught.

Fred

"Ah, sitting - the great leveler of men. From the mightest of pharaohs to the lowest of peasants, who doesn't enjoy a good sit?" M. Burns