In the interest of fair dialogue, I think it is imperative that Brian be allowed to support his claims.

Where have I ever stated otherwise? Although I think the use of the word imperative is a bit strong.

Saying that his view is wrong without giving support is in my opinion telling him that you may not be interested in what he has to say.

Where did I ever say he was wrong? Where did I ever say I wasn't interested? Why MUST we be interested? Does ones level of interest affect the truth?

God bless,