The Highway Forums General Discussion Theology Discussion Forum Question for my credo friends

Lest you think I am ignoring the Old Testament, which I in no way intend to do, consider this article and its conclusion:<br><br>http://www.palmdalereformedbaptist.org/prbc/ede_Paedoism.asp<br><br><blockquote>Conclusion<br><br>This pamphlet has suggested that a proper understanding of Covenant Theology supports a Reformed Baptist position concerning the subjects of baptism and that to get anywhere in this debate with a paedobaptist, one must approach the issue from the stand point of Covenant Theology. Starting with the Old Testament’s doctrine of the New Covenant, it was shown that this covenant is not identical with all previous covenants in that this covenant would produce a covenant community in which all know the Lord savingly thus invalidating the traditional paedobaptist argument from the covenant for baptizing infants. This argument from Covenant Theology adheres to and seeks to consistently apply the Reformed hermeneutical principle-unless rescinded, then binding. The doctrine of infant inclusion is rescinded and therefore not binding and the New Testament is not silent but very vocal and supportive of this argument. It is hoped that those toying with paedobaptism would be kept from it and those convinced of it would go back to the Scriptures and see if these things be so.</blockquote>