In reply to:
Unfortunately, Hurley's interpretation that suggests that the "covering" was nothing more than the way women fixed their hair is indefensible according to the text.

This is not the way I understood him (in context, if I am reading him right). Coiffure for him meant for the hair to be prepared in a special way, with a veil (headdress, a definition of Coiffure).... for revealing she was under submission to her husband.


Reformed and Always Reforming,