The Highway Forums General Discussion Open Forum Before taken to the woodshed

In reply to:

---

[color:"blue"]Of course, I disagree with more than just his doctrine of the Trinity..

---

So would I. I disagree with his treatment of Romans 7:14-25, his defense of supra [I can't spell this word, so I'm not going to even bother[img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/heavy.gif" alt="heavy" title="heavy[/img]. Although, certain sections I really like: Extent of the atonement, Soteriolgy, the Covenants, Federal Headship, Eschatalogy (minus the partial-preterism). In most, of these sections He quoted Hodge, Murray, Warfield, and Vos [ and perhaps that's why I like those ones
I have not read the other sections. So much things to read with so little time. Charle Hodge's systematics is still my favorite, minus the latin quotations.

in Christ,
Carlos