Donations for the month of May

We have received a total of "$25" in donations towards our goal of $175.

Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE

Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 3,198
Joined: September 2003
Forum Statistics
Most Online523
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters
Pilgrim 14,207
Tom 4,210
chestnutmare 3,198
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,835
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 23
Pilgrim 16
jta 12
John_C 5
Recent Posts
Children and Vaccines
by Tom - Sun May 22, 2022 11:50 PM
The Love of God ~ John MacArthur
by Rick Bates - Sun May 22, 2022 5:36 PM
I am mute; I do not open my mouth,
by chestnutmare - Sun May 22, 2022 3:36 PM
“You can’t Legislate Morality”
by Tom - Sat May 21, 2022 2:28 PM
Love is not a rule, but a motive.
by chestnutmare - Fri May 20, 2022 1:04 PM
by jta - Fri May 20, 2022 7:04 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#57306 Sat Jan 01, 2022 7:33 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,210
Likes: 3
Tom Online Content OP
Needs to get a Life
OP Online Content
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,210
Likes: 3
The denunciation of Richard Dawkins shows that wokeism has become a new religion

Humanists pride themselves on their rationality yet they won't give the author freedom to ask uncomfortable questions and push boundaries


The Chinese authorities have created an app that will enable citizens to report those who express “mistaken opinions”. Personally, I can’t see why they’ve gone to such trouble. They could have saved themselves a lot of time and effort by simply lifting their ban on Twitter.
After all, that’s what we in the West use it for. If anyone over here tweets a mistaken opinion, we make sure they soon regret it.
The latest in the never-ending list of offenders is Professor Richard Dawkins, author of atheist bible The God Delusion. A couple of weeks ago, he posted a tweet in which he recalled the uproar about Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who in 2015 was vilified for saying she identified as black. He then wrote: “Some men choose to identify as women, and some women choose to identify as men. You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as. Discuss.”

After the inevitable outrage, Dawkins insisted that he “did not intend to disparage trans people”; he had simply been inviting debate. “I see that my academic ‘Discuss’ question has been misconstrued as such and I deplore this,” he wrote. “It was also not my intent to ally in any way with Republican bigots in the US now exploiting this issue.”
These words, however, were not enough to satisfy his critics – or even some of his admirers. This week, the American Humanist Association (AHA) announced that it was so appalled by Dawkins’s comments, it was immediately rescinding an award it had given him.
“His latest statement implies that the identities of transgender individuals are fraudulent, while also simultaneously attacking Black identity as one that can be assumed when convenient,” it said. “Consequently, the AHA Board has concluded that Richard Dawkins is no longer deserving of being honoured by the AHA.”
For my own part, I do think the Professor’s original tweet was tactless. I’ve no doubt many people were offended. But even so, I find the AHA’s actions somewhat puzzling.
Partly this is because the award of which Professor Dawkins has been stripped is Humanist of the Year 1996. By rescinding it, the AHA is in effect arguing that the Professor’s tweets in 2021 mean that he wasn’t the world’s best humanist in 1996 after all. But that can’t be right, because he hadn’t posted the tweets then – not least because Twitter hadn’t been invented yet.
In my view, therefore, the AHA’s action betrays a profound misunderstanding of how time works. Normally, humanists tend to pride themselves on their rationality, so this is an unexpected lapse.
The other thing on which humanists tend to pride themselves, of course, is not being religious. And to me, this makes the AHA’s attitude all the more disconcerting. Because in this instance, they’re behaving as though they’re very religious indeed.
Historically, it’s been the highly religious who make a great public show of denouncing heresy. It’s been the highly religious who condemn any supposed failure to conform to the orthodox beliefs of the day.
Yet look again at that statement from this group of American humanists. The Professor’s “subsequent attempts at clarification”, apparently, “are inadequate and convey neither sensitivity nor sincerity”. As a result, he is “no longer deserving of being honoured”.
Fascinating, isn’t it? So sanctimonious. So pious. So holier-than-thou. No mercy. The heretic must be punished, or at least excommunicated. Maybe the real reason these people haven’t taken to religion is that they’ve never found one strict enough for them.
Then again, maybe they have. Wokeism: the glorious new religion of our time, whose evangelists preach their dogma with a ravening zeal from their social media pulpits, while sinners are furiously decried until they repent.
Dawkins himself doesn’t seem especially bothered by the loss of the AHA’s award. “Thinking to do my duty by deleting the entry, I opened up my CV,” he told a newspaper, “only to discover that there was nothing to delete.”
Of course, he’s quite used to people getting cross with him. Doubtless he can handle it. But, on this particular occasion, I’m just surprised that the AHA joined in with such righteous fervour.
No matter how thoughtless and insensitive the Professor’s tweet might seem, I would have expected a humanist group to respect the freedom to ask uncomfortable questions, the freedom to test the boundaries of socially acceptable thought, the freedom to cause offence.
Without that freedom, after all, there might well be no humanists.
You can read Michael Deacon’s column every Wednesday.

Last edited by Tom; Sat Jan 01, 2022 7:33 PM.
Tom #57313 Sun Jan 02, 2022 5:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 80
Likes: 5
jta Offline
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 80
Likes: 5
Or, perhaps, not a new religion at all, but the same one Satan invented millenia ago in the Garden? The one based on questioning, if not dismissing outright, everything God has said? On loving everything He hates, and hating everything He loves?

And what concerns me more about it is not that the world embraces it, but that it has deeply infiltrated the professing Church, even among many of those who claim to be Reformed.

Aspiring student of Christ
Tom #57314 Sun Jan 02, 2022 6:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,210
Likes: 3
Tom Online Content OP
Needs to get a Life
OP Online Content
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,210
Likes: 3

Of course "Wokism" is not a new religion at all. Rather it is just another aspect of the same old lies.
Apparently, Dawkins is not woke enough; which shows exactly how illogical it really is.
Many of them do not see how illogical it is, until they themselves are not woke enough and get called out for it.
In fact there are other example of this very thing.

Many feminists, who are supposed to be part of the LBGQT+ community are crying foul, because biological males who identify as female are now winning races against females.
I read about a world record in high school girls 100 meters race being broken. The person who broke the record is a biological male, who identifies as a female.
What is interesting is this person not only broke the record, they also broke the previous record for women; which was held by Florence Griffith Joyner.

jta, you are correct that what is even more concerning is wokism has now infiltrated the professing Church.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 35 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Cliniql, John E, ManassehAmerican, jta, DiscipleEddie
969 Registered Users
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Today's Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
1,341,758 Gospel truth