Donations for the month of July


We have received a total of "0" in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 3,329
Joined: September 2003
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics7,807
Posts55,005
Members971
Most Online732
Jan 15th, 2023
Top Posters
Pilgrim 14,487
Tom 4,566
chestnutmare 3,329
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,870
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 16
Pilgrim 11
John_C 3
Recent Posts
Incorruptible Bodies
by Pilgrim - Thu Jul 25, 2024 6:15 AM
First Amendment & the Constitution
by Pilgrim - Mon Jul 22, 2024 6:14 AM
Did Paul go to Spain
by Tom - Thu Jul 18, 2024 12:45 AM
The Incorruptible God
by Pilgrim - Wed Jul 17, 2024 6:04 AM
Religion and Politics
by Anthony C. - Sun Jul 14, 2024 3:52 PM
Guns and the Population
by Tom - Sun Jul 14, 2024 12:11 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#58461 Sat Mar 11, 2023 3:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
OP Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Here is something that I am trying to understand about something Dispensationalists believe.
I have been told that during the millennium, the OT sacrificial system will be reinstated.

As I think about this; I do not want to be overly critical of that view, because it may be a little bit more nuanced than that.
However my first reaction to it, is it sounds like blasphemy.

Does anyone have any knowledge to clarify my thoughts on the matter?

Tom

Tom #58462 Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,488
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,488
Likes: 58
That depends upon what version of Dispensationalism you are referring to. wink


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
OP Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Pilgrim

The only thing I can say that I do not know of its truthfulness. However, they attributed it to John MacArthur.

I have been doing a little research into this belief and it appears that most Premil-Dispensational.
Among the sources that I found helpful, in understanding their position is: https://www.gotquestions.org/millennial-sacrifices.html

Quote
Most premillennial scholars agree that the purpose of animal sacrifice during the millennial kingdom is memorial in nature. As the Lord’s Supper is a reminder of the death of Christ to the Church today, animal sacrifices will be a reminder during the millennial kingdom. To those born during the millennial kingdom, animal sacrifices will again be an object lesson. During that future time, righteousness and holiness will prevail, but those with earthly bodies will still have a sin nature, and there will be a need to teach about how offensive sin is to a holy and righteous God. Animal sacrifices will serve that purpose, "but in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins year by year" (Hebrews 10:3).
Something else I found.
Quote
The primary objection made to the idea of animal sacrifices returning during the millennial kingdom is that Christ has come and offered a perfect sacrifice for sin, and there is therefore no need to sacrifice animals for sin. However, it must be remembered that animal sacrifice never removed the sin that spiritually separated a person from the Lord.
So it would appear that although I disagree with this view; it is not quite as serious an issue as I was led to believe.

Thoughts?


Tom

Last edited by Tom; Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:13 PM.
Tom #58464 Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,488
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,488
Likes: 58
I have no idea what Progressive Dispensationalism teaches. But, classic Dispensationalism, e.g, Darby and Scofield did teach that the OT sacrifices would be reinstated. Personally, I consider this to be damnable heresy for it totally contradicts all of the OT sacrificial system which was a "shadow" of what was to come, i.e., the atonement of Christ which was able to save to the uttermost. He actually secured the salvation of the elect and thus there is no need to repeat the inferior sacrificial system which would be a gross digression.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
OP Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Pilgrim

I did an edit to my last post; and after I submitted it, I realized you replied.

Tom

Tom #58466 Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:36 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,488
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,488
Likes: 58
Again, the animal sacrifices never served as a actual payment for sin:

Quote
Hebrews 10:1-4 (ASV) 1 For the law having a shadow of the good [things] to come, not the very image of the things, can never with the same sacrifices year by year, which they offer continually, make perfect them that draw nigh. 2 Else would they not have ceased to be offered? because the worshippers, having been once cleansed, would have had no more consciousness of sins. 3 But in those [sacrifices] there is a remembrance made of sins year by year. 4 For it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins.
Those sacrifices did more than simply point out individual's sins but primarily, it was to point away from them, they being inadequate to remedy the sin problem. They were shadows of that which is signified in the coming of Christ who is the Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world. Therefore, why would the OT sacrificial be reinstituted since all has been accomplished? And further, Christ instituted the Lord's Supper for believers as a remembrance, not the unsaved. It is the Gospel that is the effectual means by which sinners are pointed to Christ as the Redeemer of sinners. The Gospel is that, through the work of the Spirit, that repentance and faith in Christ is given and sinners are saved (Rom 10:12-17; 1Thess 1:5, 2:13; Jam 1:8; 1Pet 1:23).


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
OP Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 13
Amen!

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 75
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 75
I agree that sacrifices in a supposed future 1000 year kingdom is blasphemous and a damnable heresy. Some years back I bought the John MacArthur Study Bible to see what dispensationalists today teach. Here is the annotation from Ezekiel in that book:

"40:38-47 This section describes "chambers" for the priests, and raises the question of sacrifices in the millennial kingdom. They will exist as vv. 39-43 indicate, but will be no more efficacious then they were in OT times. No sacrifice before or after Christ saves. They only point to Him as the one true Lamb who takes away sin. The Lord's Supper is a memorial that looks back to Calvary and in no way diminishes the cross. Israel rejected their Messiah but when they have received Him and are in His kingdom, they will have a memorial of sacrifices that point to Him. They will have missed the memorial of the Lord's Supper, but will then have their own memorial sacrifices for 1,000 years."

What a mess you end up with going literal when it is obvious it is NOT literal. A "memorial" when the Lord is there with the prints in his hands for them to see?


Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 84 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
DanielParvin, PaulWatkins, His Unworthy Son, Nahum, TheSojourner
971 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
July
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,530,125 Gospel truth