|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,464
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,027 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,027 Likes: 274 |
How would Henriksen be classified? I'm sure a amill, but would he be an historicist as well? The difference would be that Hendriksen and all classical Amillennialists hold to the "already but not yet" principle. As with the example of the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, it was not completely fulfilled, but it was only in part and a "type" of that final fulfillment at the end of the age immediately prior to the Great White Throne Judgment. Partial Preterists see the fall of Jerusalem and being a complete fulfillment of the prophesy and see nothing further happening at a later date. I'm not sure if you could classify Hendriksen as a "Historist". <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" /> His commentary on Revelation, More Than Conquerors will give you much more than I could here. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
152
guests, and
78
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|