Quote
How would Henriksen be classified? I'm sure a amill, but would he be an historicist as well?
The difference would be that Hendriksen and all classical Amillennialists hold to the "already but not yet" principle. As with the example of the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, it was not completely fulfilled, but it was only in part and a "type" of that final fulfillment at the end of the age immediately prior to the Great White Throne Judgment. Partial Preterists see the fall of Jerusalem and being a complete fulfillment of the prophesy and see nothing further happening at a later date. I'm not sure if you could classify Hendriksen as a "Historist". <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />

His commentary on Revelation, More Than Conquerors will give you much more than I could here. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]