|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,463
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
How many Christians/nonChristians voted for Bush for his stand against abortion? what's changed in four years, Nothing. And this goes to make my point! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> First of all, those who voted for Bush mainly on a "moral issue" were foolhearty from the start. Although I am vehemently opposed to abortion, it is NOT the "end all" issue which would either provide a country with security, peace and prosperity. Again, it is a very important issue, but is should not be made to be the singular issue upon which one casts a vote for the leadership of a country, making all other issues secondary to it, IMHO. Secondly, the "Constitutional Party" can rave all it wants about all the radical changes it would make. But are they feasible? What I mean is could their candidate, should he be voted into office actually bring about the changes he proposes as they are in their platform? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/nope.gif" alt="" /> I don't think so ..... !! I would truly like to believe that Bush would like to see and end to the current abortion laws. But the Legislative branch of government would have to create and pass new laws that would replace the ones which are now on the books. Unless he had a majority in the House and Senate, it would never happen. Presidential candidates always make these type of resolutions and promises and the public, being mostly a bunch of DOLTS, not knowing even the fundamentals about political structure; how many U.S. voters were asleep in Civics class or avoided it altogether? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/rofl.gif" alt="" />, wrongly believe that the President speaks and its done. No, he is NOT God! It just doesn't happen that way. Let's face it... if the Constitutional Party had a majority in both houses of Congress and passed all the bills proposed in their online platform, the country would probably be thrust into civil war; the people against Washington, D.C. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> It would take far more than a mere 8 years to enact never mind implement what they are advocating. In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:46 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:02 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:11 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:50 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:56 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:15 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:34 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
RefDoc
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:33 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:28 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:35 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Tom
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:13 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:25 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Tom
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 5:55 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 6:10 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Tom
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:35 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Wes
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:54 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:10 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:19 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Tom
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:18 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:55 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
janean
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:17 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:17 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:00 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 11:22 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Tom
|
Wed Mar 17, 2004 11:59 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:20 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Tom
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:34 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:44 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
janean
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:05 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:00 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:26 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:03 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Bladestunner316
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 4:44 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:26 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:46 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Bladestunner316
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:22 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:54 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Bladestunner316
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:20 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:40 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Theo
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 5:12 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 1:47 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 2:09 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
William
|
Sat Mar 20, 2004 9:00 PM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
Bladestunner316
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:02 AM
|
Re: rethinking the Election
|
4Ever_Learning
|
Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:34 PM
|
The CFR/Skull & Bones Candidates
|
Anonymous
|
Sun Mar 28, 2004 2:03 AM
|
Re: The CFR/Skull & Bones Candidates
|
John_C
|
Sun Mar 28, 2004 10:08 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
384
guests, and
48
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|