Quote
The most telling comment was this: "If you don't agree with NT Wright it's only because you don't understand him. . .or you haven't read him widely enough. . .or you need to brush up on medieval studies or philosophy. . .
This is a popular ruse used by those who are wanting to introduce spurious and/or "new thinking" into Christian doctrine. If you remember, this is exactly the same argument some used here in regard to Theonomy/Reconstructionism. If anyone disagreed with their view, it was due to the fact that they were ignorant of what Theonomy/Reconstructionism actually taught, you are unread, etc., ad nauseam. Such silliness is rather insulting in that it implies that if one really had any brains at all and had read all that had been written on the subject, then one would automatically embrace their position. [Linked Image]

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]