|
|
|
Posts: 15,027
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
#16489
Sun Jul 25, 2004 3:08 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 199
Addict
|
OP
Addict
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 199 |
What's the difference? As I am thinking about it apropos of NT Wright, one (imputation) appears to be more "real" and factual, while the other (reckoning) would be more of what they call 'forensic', or legally understood. Is my understanding correct? Can someone elaborate on this or point me to a writing that illuminates this difference?
Stand Fast, Craigellachie!
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
103
guests, and
33
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
