Quote
Ddaann said:
Seriously, and without rancour, condescension or "cheap feelings of superiority" I shall simply quit the field and hit the books.
The crucial differences between the two camps is rightly a hermeneutical issue. How much ecclesiology is effected, I'll leave that for you to judge for yourself. When I was at WTS, I wrote a major paper on baptism, trying as best as I could to remain neutral in my studies and ended up even more solidly grounded in the paedobaptist position, albeit one that is not which is typically held by many in our era, e.g., Mark Horne, Drs. McMahon, &co., who I think have gone far afield, no less so than many Baptists who do in their own respective positions.

Lastly, if by the above quoted comment you mean you are leaving the Board to pursue more important matters, then would this not go to show that for you, at least at this time in your life, you indeed see this matter of Baptism to be one of fundamental importance? What I'm trying to say is that we have had our fair/unfair share of "one-horse" individuals whose apparent "calling" in life is to set the brethren straight on whatever it is they are obsessed with. It is my hope that you will find far more to discuss, both pro and con here than just this one issue. [Linked Image]

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]