Donations for the month of May |
We have received a total of "0" in donations towards our goal of $175.
|
Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE
|
|
|
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,533
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
Forums30
Topics7,792
Posts54,932
Members974
|
Most Online732 Jan 15th, 2023
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 591
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 591 |
It is natural and instinctive for the male to attempt to protect the female. In combat this works to the detriment of the unit when females are present, as consideration is instinctively given first to the women and then to the sometimes horrendous reality of combat strategy. NO amount of training will overcome this serious compromise of mission.
In speaking of cost alone, the inclusion and consideration of the female and her need for segregated "facilities" and privacy is prohibitive and an outrageous additional expense.
I don't have the figures but it has been well noted that as the danger of military mission increases, so does the occurrence of pregnancy of the females in the military.
The presence of women in combat military units ALWAYS leads to moral and sexual complications and destruction of unit cohesion in the same way as the inclusion of homosexual men. Let's all just "pretend" that this doesn't exist!
The inclusion of women in the front lines of the military IMO is a very bad socialist, feminist and New Age joke. A joke that is presently costing not only vast amounts of additional money in training alone, but also American lives in Iraq, and who knows about the future?
There is so much more to this feminist idiocy and the destruction of American military mission, that any sane person should shake their head in disbelief.
Denny
Roms 3:22-24
Last edited by Adopted; Fri May 20, 2005 9:35 AM.
Denny
Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life." [John 6:68]
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Women In Combat?
|
Wes
|
Fri May 20, 2005 1:44 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri May 20, 2005 2:32 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Anonymous
|
Fri May 20, 2005 10:58 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Peter
|
Fri May 20, 2005 2:19 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
MarieP
|
Fri May 20, 2005 7:25 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Tom
|
Fri May 20, 2005 8:49 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Fri May 20, 2005 8:54 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Adopted
|
Fri May 20, 2005 1:16 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Tom
|
Fri May 20, 2005 5:53 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Fri May 20, 2005 6:02 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Wes
|
Sat May 21, 2005 7:34 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Tom
|
Sun May 22, 2005 12:18 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Mon May 23, 2005 5:13 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Adopted
|
Sat May 28, 2005 2:18 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Adopted
|
Sat May 21, 2005 10:15 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Mon May 23, 2005 5:47 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Anonymous
|
Mon May 23, 2005 12:24 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Wed May 25, 2005 3:21 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Adopted
|
Mon May 23, 2005 12:39 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Wed May 25, 2005 3:32 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Peter
|
Wed May 25, 2005 5:25 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon May 23, 2005 1:22 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Adopted
|
Mon May 23, 2005 2:09 PM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Wed May 25, 2005 3:40 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed May 25, 2005 4:19 AM
|
Re: Women In Combat?
|
BradJHammond
|
Fri May 20, 2005 8:01 PM
|
|
|
0 members (),
51
guests, and
23
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|