It is natural and instinctive for the male to attempt to protect the female. In combat this works to the detriment of the unit when females are present, as consideration is instinctively given first to the women and then to the sometimes horrendous reality of combat strategy. NO amount of training will overcome this serious compromise of mission.

In speaking of cost alone, the inclusion and consideration of the female and her need for segregated "facilities" and privacy is prohibitive and an outrageous additional expense.

I don't have the figures but it has been well noted that as the danger of military mission increases, so does the occurrence of pregnancy of the females in the military.

The presence of women in combat military units ALWAYS leads to moral and sexual complications and destruction of unit cohesion in the same way as the inclusion of homosexual men. Let's all just "pretend" that this doesn't exist!

The inclusion of women in the front lines of the military IMO is a very bad socialist, feminist and New Age joke. A joke that is presently costing not only vast amounts of additional money in training alone, but also American lives in Iraq, and who knows about the future?

There is so much more to this feminist idiocy and the destruction of American military mission, that any sane person should shake their head in disbelief.

Denny

Roms 3:22-24

Last edited by Adopted; Fri May 20, 2005 9:35 AM.

Denny

Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life." [John 6:68]