I'm weary of the sycophancy on this site at times (except where it's sarcastically couched)!!! Come on, let's be man enough to beg to differ.

Pilgrim, I resent your logically very flawed dismissal of my "illogical" thinking (which I regard as a name-calling cop out rather than a creditable winning of an argument). Let's suppose your future antichrist appears next week. How would you identify him, if not by his dogma and his office? In what other way would he be revealed as THE antichrist, and not AN antichrist?

Last edited by flunky1; Fri Jun 10, 2005 5:23 AM.