Do you believe in order for one to be Reformed (truly Reformed) that they must believe in the 5 solas? If yes, then how do you explain Sola Scriptura with the Charismatic belief of continued revelation; i.e. tongues and interpretation?

PS: Martyn Lloyd-Jones taught the Baptism of the Holy Spirit as a distinct experience to conversion, but according to Murray and several that knew him (one which I just spoke with the other day that is friends with his son) they state that he did not speak in tongues...

Quote
I was against Pentecostalism and still am. My doctrine of the baptism of the Spirit is that it gives full assurance. I have never been satisfied with any speaking in tongues that I have heard. (…) It is very unfair to put the label Pentecostal on me

Lloyd-Jones, Martin, Prove All Things, Banner of Truth Trust.
Thus, according to your definition here of "Reformed Charismatic," (When I say "Reformed Charismatic", I am referring to people who embrace the doctrines of grace, but believe to one degree or another that gifts like tongues etc... are still around today.) I must answer, "NO." However, I am familiar with several that do consider him Charismatic and depending on one's definition of the term ... or a given context, then ... it depends on what your definition of Reformed is ... Thus, the reason for my post asking you to define your terms more exactly ...

Reformed and Always Reforming,