[Linked Image] The ISSUE is: Can one consider someone to be consistently "Reformed" AND "Charismatic" without compromising the doctrine of "Sola Scriptura"? If one holds that the revelatory gifts are continuitous, i.e., God speaks directly to and/or through an individual then of necessity the Reformed doctrine of Sola Scriptura is compromised at best and denied at worst.

That some will claim to hold to both doctrines doesn't "prove" that they can be rightly called, "Reformed Charismatics", but rather it shows a gross inconsistency in their thinking; perhaps a misunderstanding of the doctrine of Sola Scriptura. What we are dealing here with is NOT the experience of individuals, whether it be your own or that of someone like Wayne Grudem. But contrariwise, it is a matter of objective logic and recognizing the definition of the affected doctrine(s).

In His grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]