|

|
|
|
Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,904 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,904 Likes: 1 |
Wes, Again, neither I nor the writer of the definition is promoting the correctness of the belief behind the definition. I assume everyone on The Highway strongly affirms Biblical inerrancy. However, there are those who wrongly asserts that the Bible contains some types of errors. In giving the definition of partial inerrancy, I was only trying to fine tune the definition, not advocating it. Here is the quote by the writer in his pamphlet, Translations on Trial: Is Your Bible the Word of God? by Robert Gromacki. Btw, the pamphlet is a good resource in explaining the history of the Bible compilation, major terms such as inspiration, revelation, pleneary inspiration, verbal inspiration, original writings, inerrancy, authority. Plus he gives an overview of the various translations. The Bible is inerrant and infallible in all matters which it addresses. The Bible is inspired truth, not only in issues of doctrinal faith and moral living, but also in areas of history, geography and science.
The Evangelical Theological Society is an organization whose members subscribe annually to a basic doctrinal statement: "The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written, and is therefore inerrant in the autographia."
Unfortunately, a growing number of professing evangelicals cannot consciententiously sign the statement. They embrace a position of partial or limited inerrancy. They believe the Bible is inerrant and infallible on matters of faith and practice, but not, even in the original writings, it contained historical, chronological and geographical errors.
The issue of the complete inerrancy and infallibility of the total original Scriptures is the real doctrinal battleground today. Those who embrace this foundational doctrine (Inerrancy) should unite in its defense against the attacks made by both liberals and some evangelicals. -- This was printed in 1990; it is far worse today in the questioning of biblical inerrancy.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:19 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerreancy - working definition
|
Tom
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:35 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:44 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:18 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:28 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Tom
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:52 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:22 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Tom
|
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:58 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
tartanarmy
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:25 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:16 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 3:25 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
tartanarmy
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:24 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:36 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
tartanarmy
|
Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:43 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:04 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:43 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Young Catholic
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:31 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:22 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:41 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:28 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 2:30 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:57 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:44 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Robin
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:27 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:16 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
William
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:57 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Kathy
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:15 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
William
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:05 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Kathy
|
Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:17 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:06 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:51 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:25 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:55 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
178
guests, and
41
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|