Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 176
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 176 |
Pilgrim said:straw said: Would this mean that a deconverted person has indeed fallen from grace ? No, one cannot "fall from grace"! Grace isn't something one "owns/possesses" nor has any control over. If that were the case, then grace wouldn't be grace, i.e., the unmerited favor of God; an action done by God which always produces the results intended. In this context, salvation, which cannot be lost. (Jh 6:37, 39, 40; 10:27-30; Rom 5:1; 8:1, 11, 29-30; Col 3:3, 4; 1Pet 1:5; Jude 1:1) <blockquote> 1 John 2:19 (ASV) "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us: but [they went out], that they might be made manifest that they all are not of us."<br> </blockquote> In His grace, Dear Pilgrim, You make good sense, but there are certain very trickey passages in Hebrews that lend themselves to the view that one might indeed fall from grace. Allow me: Hebrews 6 4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. According to J.C. Steen ::> 'In verse 4-6 we have a much debated and disputed portion. Calvin, in order to maintain the eternal security of the true believer, argues that those mentioned here, are professors, and not possessors, while those who believe in the "falling away" doctrine use the passage to support their peculiar tenets. I would here say that all this confusion and difficulty is not in the passage at all, but is read into it. God does not say it is impossible to renew any one again unto repentance. What the passage does say is this, "It is impossible to renew them again unto repentance while they crucify afresh the Son of God and put Him to an open shame." (see - margin of Revised.) The emphasis is on the verb, translated seeing, which is in the present participle, and must be read, "while they are." It is a case of "Cease to do evil, and learn to do well." "The falling away" of verse 5 has no reference whatever to moral evil. The delinquent here is not a moral backslider, but is an "Apostate". The evil is spiritual. It is a renunciation of the full, clear and final revelation of God in His Son, and a going back to the beggerly elements of Judaism. It was a state into which the early Hebrew believers were liable and very prone to fall. The whole letter is written to save them from this.' and, further along he adds... 'How many of God's people have we met and known, who have judged systems of religion around to be unscriptural and contrary to the mind of God and therefore have come out, yet afterward, for reasons best known to themselves, have been allured into them again and are found building again the things they once destroyed, and thus constituting themselves transgressors. (Galatians 2 v 18)
The apostate here is a supposed case, and not an actual one, for please note verse 9, "But beloved we are persuaded better things of you and things that accompany salvation though we thus speak." The "crucifying to themselves afresh the Son of God," and "putting Him to an open shame," (verse 6) ; is a condition peculiar to this apostacy. It is going back to the Jewish altars and sacrifices. Indeed, to be so guilty demands an altar and a sacrifice.' he continues further along, to say: The apostacy of this Hebrew letter was of most appalling character. It was the renunciation of Jesus as true Messiah. It was an agreement with His mock trail and ignominious death. It was a revival of the cry, "Away with Him ! Away with Him !" etc. It was truly a crucifixion of the Son of God and the putting of Him to an open shame.' How precise are these thoughts to those who hanker back to the Mass. Who have not understood that, ' by one offering' he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.' (Hebrews 10:14) and, 'by the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ ' once' for all.' (Hebrews 10:10) and, 'For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but ' now once' in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.' (Hebrews 9:26) <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/BigThumbUp.gif" alt="" />
Last edited by straw; Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:46 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Deconversion ?
|
straw
|
Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:25 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
Young Catholic
|
Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:22 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
straw
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:38 AM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
William
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:11 AM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
straw
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:31 AM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
John_C
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:09 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
William
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:11 AM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
Young Catholic
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:09 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
straw
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:42 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
Young Catholic
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:49 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:49 PM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
straw
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:20 AM
|
Re: Deconversion ?
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:22 PM
|
|
|
|
1 members (Pilgrim),
127
guests, and
38
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|