Quote
Kyle said:
We ought to unswervingly uphold the authority and absolute truth of Scripture without making modern scientific presuppositions the ground of truth.
Yes indeed.

Has anyone ever noticed how the Darwinists cover their ignorance with big words meant to impress the unenlightened? Take a look at how many times the word "assume","hypothesis" or "assumption" is used in the following that I Googled from UC Berkeley (surprise, surprise).

Quote
“Synopomorphies are the basis for cladistics.

Cladistics is a particular method of [hypothesizing] relationships among organisms. Like other methods it has its own set of [assumptions], procedures and limitations. Cladistics is now accepted as the best method available for phylogenic analysis, for it provides an explicit and testable [hypothesis] of organismal relationships.” [Emphasis my own]

These people are simply choosing from the billions of facts of nature, those facts that tend to support their secular/religious view of creation. When examined, all of Darwinists thought is presented in this very way. When their own "facts" don't fit their theory they simply add more billions of years of "Evolution" to accomodate their presuppositions and very un-scientific faith in the "magical mutating gene".

Quote
Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of an incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures. [Romans 1:22,23 NASB]

Denny

Romans 3:22-24

Denny

Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life." [John 6:68]