Quote
via_dolorosa said:
We obviously have differences in regards to items such as imputed righteousness and the role of good works in which we differ, but there are some important areas where our agreement is critical. Such areas are the person of Christ and His unique qualifications which would make the Mormon "Christ" unfit, and the understanding of what it is we are saved from, an understanding that eludes Universalists. There are many areas in which our definition of the gospel agree. We can discuss the disagreements civilly I hope.
via_dolorosa,

1. Yes, without question there are major differences in regard to "imputed righteousness" and "the role of good works" which exist between us. And thus the justified critical remark that Rome holds to and teaches another gospel. For, these two elements are at the very foundation of what defines the salvation presented in the Gospel.

2. Undeniably, there are some areas of doctrine, e.g., the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the person of the Holy Spirit, and some others to which we would agree. However, those similarities do not equate to being one with God nor fellowship in Christ since that fellowship is dependent upon how one is united to Him by grace through faith. On this matter, again we are poles apart. The picture you want to paint is with a very broad brush and perhaps from a distance that picture appears to be a good one. However, upon closer examination, one can see that the picture is fatally flawed; lacks precision and is a false representation of the truth as revealed in God's inspired infallible and inerrant Word.

3. The ongoing differences between the Roman State Church and historic Protestants (I must emphasize "historic", i.e., those that still adhere to the doctrines of the Protestant Reformation) which are known as Reformed and/or Calvinist are not to be found in virtue but in those doctrines which define the truth as it is in Christ and also those which determine what "good works" are and their place in salvation.

4. We have no qualms about discussing such doctrines, especially soteriology; the doctrine of salvation, aka: Sola Fide. They have been debated for centuries by far better and able men than any of us here without resolve. Nevertheless, the defense of this biblical doctrine can be done and has been done by lesser men and quite effectively. Should you desire to do so, then you are more than welcome to begin a new thread with whatever subject you choose. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

In His grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]