Quote
Pilgrim said:
Quote
xyz said:
Perhaps he was not, but presumably there is no argument that Jesus 'became sin'.

Does that mean that Father and Spirit did not experience becoming sin? That they do may be the meaning of the SBC theologian.
1. There is no argument that Jesus "became sin" if understood correctly. The Lord Christ did not actually become sin, else He would have been a sinner Himself thus effectively making His atonement of no value. When Paul says that Jesus "became sin", he means he vicariously stood in the elect's place as is certainly clear from the passage itself:

<blockquote>
2 Corinthians 5:21 (ASV) "Him who knew no sin he made [to be] sin on our behalf; that we might become the righteousness of God in him."

</blockquote>
2. Correct, the Father and Spirit did NOT "experience becoming sin" as that was unique to the incarnate Christ.
That uniqueness is not stated in Scripture. No doubt the SBC theologian is as aware of that verse as any.