|
|
|
Posts: 15,138
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,484
Posts56,709
Members995
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Socialism
by Pilgrim - Mon Aug 17, 2026 2:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
#40547
Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:21 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,896 Likes: 51
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,896 Likes: 51 |
I recently watched a short excerpt of a debate by James White on You Tube called 'Why George Bryson Won't Debate Anymore'. I was expecting to hear something that seemed worthy of the title, however although I agreed with James White about the issue, I am not sure why this would cause George Bryson not to debate anymore. The issue was over how John 6 should be interpreted and Bryson gave the standard Arminian answer, yet I am not sure why James White used that particular tactic. Anyone care to tell me why? You can view it here . Tom
Last edited by Tom; Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
