Originally Posted by William
*WARNING*- If you subscribe to modern version only-ism/anti-King James. Don't clicky on the thingy. moron
One doesn't have to subscribe to some form of "modern version only-ism/anti-King James" to find fault with the TBS arguments and their King James onlyism rhetoric. I personally use the KJV for most everything but serious study. Yet hardly would I ever insist that it is "inspired of God", which is basically what the TBS is trying to convince people of. The KJV is not faithful to the Textus Receptus either. As I read through my Greek Text (both TR and UBS Kurt Arland) the KJV wrongly translates words no less than other versions; some blatantly so, e.g., substituting "sons" for "children" which is inexcusable for the Greek word for son is uios and for children it is tekna. Hardly could one not see the difference, but the KJV translators chose to ignore the Greek word tekna in many places and replace it with son and in doing so changes the meaning of the passages where the substitution appears. igiveup

So, have YOU personally embraced and thus are now promoting KJV-onlyism? scratchchin

In His grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]