Pilgrim,
Thanks for the source; thanks for passing it on...appreciated it. Guess I could of just LIU'd it on my own, instead of asking you
-- But thanks! And thanks again for the article! It re-called to my mind Jonathan Edward's sermon on biblical election.
A pastor sent it to me via e-mail, doubtless knowing I would get an initial laugh out of it and then lament that the unregenerate of this world, both in and out of the Church don't have a clue.
Respectfully, I'm glad the pastor did, as the article excited me to copy and save it (hope you don't mind) for an article I'm planning to write soon (off computer; not implying the-highway forum) after I finish course exams, for it ties so concisely to the subjects in current study.
Thanks for the "Chosen But Free?" article reference too. Went there, read it...I really need to research more into Geisler's heresies and literary works though, thank you.
I noticed your Cheshire Cat, and I must confess after reading your posted
Researchers probe whether ‘free will’ exists article I thought, well sure, if the humanist literary department so contrives "reconciliation" of biblical creation to Neo-Darwinistic chaos then, "yikes my eyes!" this "free will" issue so investigated by many unregenerate (maybe trifle radical?) class of experts warrants really not so dilemma the sudden falling down a hole front page news report after all, since rationally graced, Bible believing Christians KNOW that they are only chasing fruitlessly for the wrong “right theoretically ideal” white rabbit once again, with unsatisfactory results; for how can a wrong-right rabbit rationally occupy the missing chair at the humanist GOP theorem table when such “ideal” characters like Mad Hatter, March Hare and Co. sit to advocate? I mean, would
YOU trust a March Hare who pours tea through his broken teacup?
